Pack and Others v Bathurst

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1745
Date01 January 1745
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 26 E.R. 957

HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY

Pack and Others
and
Bathurst

3ATK. 270. GYLES V. WILCOCKS 957 Case 92.-gyles versus wilcocks, barow and nutt. (S. C. 2 Atk. 141.) . On March the 13th, 1740, this cause, by order of Lord Hardwicke, stood at the head of the paper of that day, when he directed the bill against the defendant Nwtt to be dismissed without costs, and as between the plaintiffs and the defendants Wilcocks and Barlow, by consent of the plaintiff Gyles, present in court, on behalf of himself and the other plaintiffs, and by consent of the defendant Wilcocks present in court, arid of Mr. Hodgson of counsel with the defendant Barlow, all matters in difference between the said parties in this cause, were by his Lordship referred to the award and determination of Mr. Gay and Mr. Thomas Stephens, and they were to make their award therein on or before the first day of Trinity term next; and in case they could not agree therein, they were to name an umpire, who was to make his umpirage on or before the first day of Michaelmas term next; and such award or umpirage was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Dellway Investment Ltd and Others v National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) and Others
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 12 April 2011
    ...TURNER v SMITH 1901 1 CH 213 SIMMONS v MONTAGUE 1909 1 IR 87 TAHITI COTTON CO, IN RE 17 LR EQ 273 TRUSTEE ACT 1893 S5 ASHENHURST v JAMES 26 ER 958 1745 3 ATK 270 EARL OF MACCLESFIELD v FITTON 23 ER 392 1683 1 VERN 168 FORSYTH & ANOR v BLUNDELL & ANOR; ASSOCIATED SECURITIES LTD v BLUNDELL 19......
  • Action Scaffolding & Rigging Pty Limited (in liq) v Citadel Financial Corporation Pty Ltd, in the matter of Action Scaffolding & Rigging Pty Limited (in liq)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 13 March 2019
    ...(NSW) s 12 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW) s 3 Local Court Rules 2009 (NSW) r 8.10 Cases cited: Ashenhurst v Jones (1745) 3 Atk 270; 26 ER 958 Australian Guarantee Corporations Limited v Balding [1930] HCA 10; (1930) 43 CLR 140 Chatterton v Maclean [1951] 1 All ER 761 F......
  • Ashenhurst v James
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • Invalid date
    ...charges a fact by his bill, which is denied by the defendant's answer, and the plaintiff examines only English Reports Citation: 26 E.R. 958 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY Ashenhurst and James Case 94.-[ANON.] January 25, 1744. Rehearings. Where a plaintiff examines only one witness to establish ......
  • Anonymous (1744) 3 Atk 270
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 3 February 1745
    ...E.R. 958" class="content__heading content__heading--depth1"> English Reports Citation: 26 E.R. 958 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY Ashenhurst and James Case 94.-[ANON.] January 25, 1744. Rehearings. Where a plaintiff examines only one witness to establish a fact, yet the court will so far lay stress......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT