Palser v Grinling Property Holding Company Ltd; Property Holding Company Ltd v Mischeff
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Viscount Simon,Lord Thankerton,Lord Porter,Lord Macdermott |
Judgment Date | 19 December 1947 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1947] UKHL J1219-1 |
Date | 19 December 1947 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
64 cases
-
Marchant v Charters
...tenancy out of protection, under section 2(3) of the 1968 Act. 18 The word "attendance" was much considered by the House of Lords in Palser v. Grinling, which was reported in (1948) Appeal Cases 291. Lord Simon the Lord Chancellor at pages 310 and 311 said that attendance means "services p......
-
Marchant v Charters
...tenancy out of protection, under section 2(3) of the 1968 Act. 18 The word "attendance" was much considered by the House of Lords in Palser v. Grinling, which was reported in (1948) Appeal Cases 291. Lord Simon the Lord Chancellor at pages 310 and 311 said that attendance means "services p......
-
Granada Theatres Ltd v Freehold Investments (Leytonstone) Ltd
...fixed meaning and as being an unsatisfactory medium for conveying the idea of some ascertainable proportion of a whole. In the case of palser v. Grinling, reported in 1948 Appeal Cases, page 291, a question arose as to what was a 'substantial portion' of a rent, and the decision is summaris......
-
Attorney General of the Duchy of Lancaster v G. E. Overton (Farms) Ltd
...percentage of 20% would be substantial, but the House of Lords said: "No, don't lay down percentages, leave it quite generally". It is Palser v. Grinling (1948) A.C. 291. At page 317 Lord Simon 48 said: "'Substantial' in this connexion is not the same as 'not unsubstantial', i.e., just enou......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Release, Discharge or Modification of Restrictive Covenants
...[19]–[23], where Carnwath LJ said that it will be something which is ‘considerable, solid, big’ (drawing support from Palser v Grinling [1948] AC 291 at 317 (a Rent Act case)). At [23] Carnwath LJ said that he would prefer not to seek a degree of precision for the term ‘substantial’ and he ......