Panayi v Roberts
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1993 |
| Year | 1993 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Captain Nigel Crighton Pease v Jeffrey William Carter
...two earlier decisions of the Court of Appeal concerning notices under section 20(1)(c) were consistent with that approach. The first was Panayi v Roberts (1993) 25 HLR 421, in which it was held that a notice which stated that the tenancy would run from 7 November 1990 to 6 May 1991, wherea......
-
Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd
...other cases on notices under section 20(1)(c) of the 1988 Act to which reference is made in the judgment in York v Casey. In the one, Panayi v Roberts [1993] 28 EG 125, [1993] 2 EGLR 51, the decision went the other way. On the facts, this Court (Lord Justice Mann and Lord Justice Ralph Gib......
-
Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall ; Ravenscroft Properties Ltd v Hall ; Kasseer v Freeman ; White v Chubb (No1)
...similarities and differences according to the use which they wished to make of them as binding precedents. The court was referred to Panayi v. Roberts [1993] 2 EGLR 51; Andrews v. Brewer (1997) 30 HLR; York v. Casey [1998] 2 EGLR 25; Clickex Ltd v. McCann [1999] 2 EGLR 63; and Manel v. Memo......
-
Mr David andrews and Another v Mr Roger Brewer and Another
...it was obviously wrong and clearly a clerical error. Put in a way which this court has done in the case of Panayi and Another v Roberts (1993) 28 E.G. 125, it was an evident error, one which would have been understood to be so by the parties and one which would not vitiate the notice. I cit......
Request a trial to view additional results