Panton, Widow, v Jones
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 08 April 1813 |
| Date | 08 April 1813 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 1415
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS
Panton
Widow
and
Jones
Thursday, April 8, 1813. panton, widow, v. jones. (If the occupier of a house submits to a distress for rent stated in the notice of distress to be due from him as tenant to the distramer, this is an acknowledgment of the tenancy ) This was an action for the use and occupation of a house at Bristol. The defendant had never paid rent personally to the plaintiff, and she did not give strict...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
- Chee Seng & Company Sdn Bhd; Seng Huat Hang Sdn Bhd and Others
-
Trent v Hunt
...he would have been estopped from afterwards disputing the mortgagor's claim: Cooper v. Blandy (1 Bing. N. C. 45), Panton v. Jones (3 Camp. 372) Secondly. A mortgagor in possession has no implied authority to distrain in the name of the mortgagee. The case of a receiver in Chancery affords n......
-
Doe on the several demises of Henry Chawner, Henry William Beavan, and Hugh Phillips Beavan, against Henry Boulter
...J. there, shew that under such circumstances the tenant cannot defeat the landlord's title. The language of Bayley J. in Panton v. Jones (3 Campb. 372), is to the same effect. And the defendant, who could not have set up the lease against Chawner, cannot, a fortiori, do so against Hugh. It ......
-
Crawford v Gillmor
...Kennedy v. Phelan Ibid. 320 n. Rankin v. Mc MurtryUNK 24 L. R. Ir. 290. Doe d. Rutledge v. JenningsUNK 3 Ir. L. R. 268. Panton v. JonesENR 3 Camp. 372. Keene v. M'BlaineUNK 17 Ir. C. L. R. 654. Billing v. ArnoldUNK Ir. R. 7 C. L. 529. Campion v. CampionUNK Ir. R. 8 C. L. 313. Barnes v. Barn......
Get Started for Free