Pappa v Rose
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1865 |
Court | Court of Common Pleas |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Sutcliffe v Thackrah
...acting for one party should in the event of a dispute be an artbitrator between the two parties. This was well illustrated in the case of Pappa v. Rose in (1871) 7 C.P. 32. The Plaintiff employed the Defendant for reward as selling broker to sell raisins. The sale-note recorded various term......
-
Jones v Sherwood Computer Services Plc
...came to change his views between 1954 and 1976. The reason for that was that in 1954 there was an established line of authority, from Pappa v. Rose [1871] L.R. 7 CP 32 to Finnegan v. Allen [1943] KB 425 to the effect that a valuer who had given a certificate as an expert was not liable to a......
-
Arenson v Arenson
...to Brightman J., who delivered a reserved judgment ( [1972] 1 W.L.R. 1196). He held that a clear line of authority ( Pappa v. Rose (1871) L.R. 7 C.P.32, (1872) L.R. 7 C.P.525; Tharsis Sulphur and Copper Co. Ltd. v. Loftus (1872) L.R. 8 C.P. 1; Stevenson v. Watson (1879) 4 C.P.D. 148; Cham......
-
National Infrastructure Development Company Ltd v Construtora Oas S.A.
...his views between 1954 and 1976. The reason for that was that in 1954 there was an established line of authority, from Pappa v. Rose (1871) L.R. 7 C.P. 32 to Finnegan v. Allen [1943] K.B. 425, to the effect that a valuer who had given a certificate as an expert was not liable to an action ......