Parading v Jane
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1681 |
Date | 01 January 1681 |
Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 897
King's Bench Division
Rule applied, Atkinson v. Ritchie, 1809, 10 East, 533; Lloyd v. Guibert, 1865, L. R. 1 Q. B. 121. Discussed, Lord Clifford v. Watts, 1870, L. R. 5 C. P. 586. Adopted, Carstairs v. Taylor, 1871, L. R. 6 Ex. 223. Questioned, and not applied, The Teutonia, 1871, L. R. 3 A. & E. 411. Limited, Jackson v. Union Marine Insurance Company, 1874, L. R. 10 C. P. 139. Explained, Wear River Commissioners v. Adamson, 1877, 2 App. Cas. 748. Rule applied, Sheffield Waterworks Company v. Carter, 1882, 8 Q. B. D. 645; Jacobs v. Crédit Lyonnais, 1884, 12 Q. B. D. 603.
*lr7-}.K.Q ./L-tMics. 23 car. banco eegis. nntf 4 c '?? Wiy.iK.n.-tttz**' ~ taradine versus jane. hil. 22 car. eot. 1178, & 1179. [Eule applied, Atkinson v. Ritchie, 1809, 10 East, 533 ; Lloyd v. Guibert, 1865, L. E. 1 Q. B. 121. Discussed, Lord Clifford v. Watts, 1870, L. E. 5 C. P. 586. Adopted, Garstairs v. Taylor, 1871, L. E. 6 Ex. 223. Questioned, and not applied, The Teutonia, 1871, L. E. 3 A. & E. 411. Limited, Jackson v. Union Marine Insurance Company, 1874, L. E. 1Q G. P. 139. Explained, Wear River Commissioners v. Adamson, 1877, 2 App. Gas, 748. Eule applied, Sheffield Waterworks Company v. Carter, 1882, 8 Q. B. D. 645 ; Jacobs v. Credit Lyonnais, 1884, 12 Q. B. D. 603.] Debt, In debt the plaintiff declares upou a lease for years rendringrent at the four usual feasts ; and for rent behind for three years, ending at the Feast of the Annunciation, 21 Car. brings his action ; the defendant pleads, that a certain German prince, by name Prince Eupert, are alien born, enemy to the King and kingdom, had invaded the realm with an hostile army of men ; and with the same force did enter upon the [27] defendant's possession, and him expelled, and held out of possession from the 19 of July 18 Gar. till the Feast of the Annunciation, 21 Car. whereby he could not take the profits ; whereupon the plaintiff demurred, and the plea was resolved insufficient. 1. Because the defendant hath not answered to one quarters rent. ò 2. He hath not averred that the army were all aliens, which shall not be intended, and then he hath his remedy against them ; and Bacon cited 33 H. 6. 1. e. where the gaoler in bar of an escape pleaded, that alien enemies broke the prison, &c. and òexception taken to it, for that he ought to shew of what countrey they were, viz. Scots, &c. 3. It was resolved, that the matter of the plea was insufficient ; for...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Planet Kids Ltd v Auckland Council
...Treitel Frustration and Force Majeure (2nd ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2004) at [2-010]–[2-043]. 33 Paradine v Jane (1646) Aleyn 26 at 27, 82 ER 897 (KB) at 897–898. 34 See Treitel, above n 32, at [2-029]–[2-034] for a discussion of circumstances in which the doctrine of absolute contracts......
-
Cricklewood Property and Investment Trust Ltd v Leighton's Investment Trust Ltd
...earlier days the element of covenant bulked sometimes more largely in the eyes of the law than the question of tenure. In Paradine v. Jane, Aleyn 26, Style 47, the Judges do not mention the element of tenure. The claim was in debt. The Court states the absolute character of the contract in ......
-
National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd
...11The doctrine of frustration is of comparatively recent development. The general rule of common law, laid down as early as 1647 in Paradine v. Jane ( Aleyn 26) is that the performance of absolute promises is not excused by supervening impossibility of performance. Paradine v. Jane itself, ......
-
Joseph Constantine Steamships Line v Imperial Smelting Corporation
...by unforeseen accidents, performance has become impossible. And a dictum unnecessary to the decision, of the Court of King's Bench in Paradine v. Jane, Aleyn, 26 1178, is often quoted: "When the party, by his own conduct, creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good, i......
-
Force majeure clauses and COVID-19 ' What you need to know now about your contracts
...benefit your business in determining a pathway to deal with the issues that arise due to COVID-19. Footnotes 1 Paradine v Jane (1647) 82 ER 897. 2 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 122 ER 309. 3 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337. 4 Davis Contractors Limite......
-
Defining the Obligation to Perform
...the sea, or made barren by wildfire, yet the lessor shall have his whole rent: and judgment was given for the plaintiff. Paradine v. Jane , Aleyn 26, 82 Eng. Rep. 897 (K.B. 1647). 1.2.2. Analyzing Risk Economists and businesspeople often analyze contingencies using the framework of expected......
-
Frustration
...was not made, however, until the second phase in the development of the doctrine initiated by Blackburn J’s decision 8 (1647), Aleyn 26, 82 ER 897 (KB) [ Paradine ]. 9 See, for example, Walton v Waterhouse (1673), 2 Wms Saund 420, 85 ER 1233 (KB); Hadley v Clark (1799), 8 TR 259, 101 ER 137......
-
The limits of voluntariness in contract.
...above n 185. (244) Ibid 71. (245) Ibid. (246) Ibid. (247) Ibid 79. (248) Ibid 72. (249) Ibid 80. (250) Ibid. (251) (1647) Aleyn 26; 82 ER 897. (252) (1863) 3 B & S 826; 122 ER 309. (253) (1647) Aleyn 26, 26; 82 ER 897, 897. (254) Langille and Ripstein, above n 185, 80. (255) Ibid. (256)......
-
Right to Damages in European Contract Law
...eans as strongly ba sed on the fault pri nciple as is often assu med”).45 See Treitel Remedie s para 8.46 Paradine v Jane (1647) EWHC KB J5 Aleyn 26 (dealing with a landlor d’s action t o recover rent; t he tenant was not exc used from pay ment, even thoug h he had been evic ted from the la......
-
10 C.F.R. 835 app A to Part 835 Derived Air Concentrations (Dac) For Controlling Radiation Exposure to Workers At Doe Facilities
...E-07 - - 1 E + 04 - - E/ / Na-24 4 E-07 - - 1 E + 04 - - ET/ / Mg-28 3 E-07 3 E-07 - 1 E + 04 1 E + 04 - ET/St/ Al-26 4 4 E-08 - 1 E + 03 1 E + 03 - St/St/ Si-31 9 E-06 5 E-06 5 E-06 3 E + 05 1 E + 05 1 E + 05 ET/St/St Si-32 1 E-07 5 E-08 1 E-08 5 E + 03 2 E + 03 3 E + 02 St/St/St ...
-
Radiological Protection Act, 1991 (Ionising Radiation) Order, 2000
...5,3 10-9 0,500 4,7 10-9 2,2 10-9 1,3 10-9 7,3 10-10 6,0 10-10 M 1,000 7,3 10-9 0,500 7,2 10-9 3,5 10-9 2,3 10-9 1,5 10-9 1,2 10-9 Aluminium Al-26 7,16 105 F 0,020 8,1 10-8 0,010 6,2 10-5 3,2 10-8 2,0 10-8 1,3 10-8 1,1 10-8 M 0,020 8,8 10-8 0,010 7,4 10-8 4,4 10-8 2,9 10-8 2,2 10-8 2,0 10-8 ......
-
PL 109-224, S 1382 – A bill to require the Secretary of the Interior to accept the conveyance of certain land, to be held in trust for the benefit of the Puyallup Indian tribe.
...portion of Government lot 1, sec. 07, T. 20 N., R. 4 E., of the Willamette Meridian, described as commencing at Highway Engineer's Station AL 26 6+38.0 P.O.T. on the AL26 line survey of SR 5, Tacoma to King County (II) Thence S8854'30" E., along the north line of said lot 1 a distance of 9......