Parker v North British Railway Company

JurisdictionScotland
CourtCourt of Session (Inner House - Second Division)
Judgment Date01 July 1898
Date01 July 1898
Docket NumberNo. 171.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Hall Russell & Company Ltd (Esso Bernicia)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 October 1988
    ...trite law that all claims arising out of a single act of negligence must be pursued in the same action. In Stevenson v. Pontifex & Wood (1887) 15 R. 125 Lord President Inglis enunciated the rule of practice as follows at p. 129: "I am of opinion that a single act amounting either to delict......
  • Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 2 March 2007
    ...cited Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485 cited Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 cited Grant v Henry (1894) 21 R 358 cited Northern Territory v Alyawarr (2005) 145 FCR 442 followed Western Australia v Ward (2002) 213 CLR 1 cited Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (19......
  • Commissioners Of Customs And Excise V. Robertsons Electrical Limited
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 11 November 2005
    ...sale if goods are supplied on approval (Bryce v Ehrmann, (1904) 7 F 5, Lord Trayner at p 13) or on sale or return (Macdonald v Westren (1888) 15 R. 988, Lord Young at p 989). It follows that there is no taxable supply under section 4 of VATA 1994. The taxable supply occurs only "when it bec......
  • China Agrotech Holdings Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 19 September 2017
    ...(18) Picard v. Primeo Fund, 2013 (1) CILR 164, considered. (19) Queensland Mercantile & Agency Co. Ltd. v. Australasian Inv. Co. Ltd. (1888), 15 R. 935, considered. (20) Rome v. Punjab National Bank (No. 2), [1989] 1 W.L.R. 1211; [1990] 1 All E.R. 58; [1989] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 354; (1989), 5 BC......
  • Get Started for Free