Partenreederei M/S 'Heidberg' v Grosvenor Grain and Feed Company Ltd (The Heidberg)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1993
Date1993
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Union de Remorquage et de Sauvetage SA v Lake Avery Inc. ('The Lake Avery') [QBD (Admiralty)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • 4 November 1996
    ... ... Heidberg, TheUNK [1994] 2 L1 Rep 287 ... in with my own name and the name of the company and I had already signed the Form. Whilst ... ...
  • Toepfer (Alfred C.) International G.m.b.H. v Société Cargill France
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 November 1997
    ...then there has been discussion and disagreement as to the ambit of the Article 1(4) evidenced by the following cases: The Heidberg [[1994] 2 Lloyds Rep. 287; The Angelic Grace [1994] 1 Lloyds Rep. 168; The Xing Su Hai [1995] 2 Lloyds Rep. 15; Toepfer v. Molino Boschi [1996] 1 Lloyds Rep......
  • The London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v The Kingdom of Spain
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 November 2021
    ...he referred and we agree with him that the reasoning in those decisions is to be preferred to that in Partenreederei M/S Heidberg v Grosvenor Grain and Feed Co Ltd, The Heidberg [1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 287. Another way of putting the same point there is to ask the question posed by Rix J in Q......
  • The Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 October 2013
    ...J to three prior cases in which the English courts had considered the French blocking statute: (1) Partenreederei M/S "Heidberg" v. Grosvenor Grain & Feed Co Ltd, "The Heidberg" [1993] I.L.Pr. 718, in which Cresswell J held there was no risk that compliance by two French defendants with a d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • THE USE AND ABUSE OF ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTIONS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...Naviera Micro SA v Shipley International Inc[1982] 2 Lloyd's Rep 351; and Partenreederei M/S v Grosvenor Grain and Feed Co Ltd[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 287. 210 The US Supreme Court in Scherk v Alberto-Culver Co(1974) 417 US 506 treated arbitration clauses and jurisdiction clauses as the same sp......
  • RATIONALISING AND SIMPLIFYING THE PRESUMPTION OF SIMILARITY OF LAWS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Inc v Marniteknik Shipbuilders (S) Pte Ltd[2014] 1 SLR 860 at [61]. 55 The last-mentioned point was never in contemplation. 56 [1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 287. 57 Partenreederei MS “Heidberg” v Grosvenor Grain & Feed Co Ltd [1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 287 at 307–308. The Commercial Court determined that ......
  • CHOICE OF LAW FOR ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...Rep 548; and Union Transport plc v Continental Lines SA[1992] 1 WLR 15. On the other hand, the lex fori was applied in The Heidberg[1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 287; Egon Oldendorff v Libera Corp[1995] 2 Lloyd's Rep 64; and Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co Inc v Fay(1988) 65 CLR 197. 37 The Heid......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT