Partington v Attorney General

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1865
Date1865
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
41 cases
  • Bolton (Elaine Yvonne) v Commissioner of Stamp Duty and Transfer Tax
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 26 March 1999
    ...it." 48 The rule of strict interpretation enunciated by Rowlatt J, applies equally to the Crown and the subject. Lord Cairus in Parkington v Attorney General (1869) LR 4 HL 100 said at p. 122: "If the person sought to be taxed comes within the letter of the law he must be taxed, however gr......
  • McGrath v McDermott
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 July 1988
    ...(5) 1966 3 All E.R. 77 (6) Revenue Commissioners -v- Doorley, Bishop of Elphin ( 1933 I.R.) 750. (7) Partington -v- Attorney General L.R. 4 H.L. 100 at 122. (8) In course of argument Counsel expressly conceded that a like approach must be brought by the Revenue to a scheme which had no gai......
  • MacAonghusa v Ringmahon Company
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 26 November 1999
    ...DUKE OF WESTMINSTER 1936 AC 1 O'SULLIVAN V P LTD 3 ITC 255 REVENUE COMMISSIONERS V DOORLEY, BISHOP OF ELPHIN 1933 IR 750 PARTINGTON V AG LR 4 HL 100 MALLALIEU V DRUMMOND (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) 1983 STC 655 INCOME & CORPORATION TAXES ACT 1970 S130(a) (UK) STRONG & CO OF ROMSEY LTD V WOODIFI......
  • Revenue Commissioners v O'Flynn Construction Ltd & O'Flynn
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 14 December 2011
    ...[2010] FCA 124; Saatchi & Saatchi Advertising Ltd v McGarry [1998] 2 IR 562; AG v Carlton Bank [1899] 2 QB 155; Partington v AG [1869] LR 4 HL 100; IR Commissioners v Wesleyan & General Assurance Society [1946] 2 All ER 749; Burmah Oil v Bank of England [1980] AC 1090; Cape Brandy Syndicat......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Should Corporate Tax Avoidance Be Criminalised?
    • United Kingdom
    • Southampton Student Law Review No. 6-1, January 2016
    • 1 January 2016
    ...Avoidance’ [2012] Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation 1, 3 accessed 18 December 2014, 9. 50 Partington v Attorney General (1869) L.R. 4 H.L. 100, 122. 51ibid 122. 52 Cape Brandy Syndicate v IRC [1921] 1 KB 64. 53ibid 71. 97! S.S.L.R Should Corporate Tax Avoidance Be Criminalised?......
  • Tax uncertainty.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 3, December 2009
    • 1 December 2009
    ...hearing the matter were party. (60) (1937) 57 CLR 233, 239. (61) [1936] AC 1, 24-5 (Lord Russell), quoting Partington v A-G (UK) (1869) LR 4 HL 100, 122 (Lord (62) Sir Anthony Mason, 'Taxation Policy and the Courts' (1990) 2(4) CCH Journal of Australian Taxation 40; Justice D Graham Hill, "......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT