Pasternack v Poulton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Year1973
Date1973

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Freeborn v Thomas (Note)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Froom v Butcher
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 July 1975
    ...negligence but that it had not been established in that case, and, in any event, that it would not have saved the injuries. In Pasternack v. Poulton (1973) R.T.R. 334, a young woman undergraduate was a passenger on a short trip in Bristol. It was driven by a fellow student. He drove into a ......
  • Drage v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Vijayan a/l Kunju Kunju v Yunos b Dollah and Another
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Apportionment of Responsibility
    • United Kingdom
    • Oxford University Press Books and Journals Contributory Negligence (Second Edition)
    • Invalid date
    ...in New South Wales of a discount higher than 40 per cent being imposed in such a case). 219 See Munkman, para 6.19. 220 But see Pasternack v Poulton [1973] 1 WLR 476 (QBD) (5 per cent); Snushall v Fulsang (2006) 258 DLR (4th) 425 (Ont CA) (5 per cent); Nominal Defendant v Rooskov [2012] NSW......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Oxford University Press Books and Journals Contributory Negligence (Second Edition)
    • Invalid date
    ...A1.20 Parkinson v Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service [2009] NIQB 87 ����������������������������������� A1.50 Pasternack v Poulton [1973] 1 WLR 476 (QBD)��������������������������������������������������������������������������4.70 Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, [2017] AC 467 ���������......