Paterson v Chadwick
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1974 |
| Year | 1974 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
22 cases
-
Campbell v O Donnell and Others
... ... BUTTERWORTHS WORDS & PHRASES LEGALLY DEFINED 3ED 1988 "IN RESPECT OF" TRUSTEES EXECUTORS & AGENCY CO LTD v REILLY 1941 VLR 110 PATERSON v CHADWICK 1974 2 AER 772 R (GEOLOGISTICS LTD) v FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANSATION SCHEME 2003 EWHC 629 PERSONAL INJURIES ASSESSMENT ... ...
-
Sweeney v Duggan
...& Co. Ltd.ELR [1975] Q.B. 582, McGahie v. Union of Shop Distributors and Allied WorkersUNK[1966] S.L.T. 74 and Peterson v. ChadwickWLR[1974] 1 W.L.R. 890 considered. High Court [1989 No. 2602P] Sweeney v. Duggan Daniel Sweeney Plaintiff and Denis Duggan Defendant Cases mentioned in this rep......
-
Burns v Shuttlehurst Ltd
...authorities at first instance (one in Scotland) and one in the Court of Appeal where this expression has been considered. In Paterson v Chadwick [1974] 1 WLR 890 the plaintiff underwent allegedly negligent dental treatment in 1969. Her solicitors failed to issue proceedings in time against ......
-
R (Geologistics Ltd) v Financial Services Compensation Scheme
...that a narrower construction was apposite. 13There was cited to the judge, the decision of Boreham J in the case of Paterson v Chadwick [1974] 1 WLR 890. As the judge said, that was a decision on the ambit of the phrase “in respect of” as used in section 32 of the Administration of Justice ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
TAXATION OF EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
...the two subject-matters to which the words refer.’ This statement has been approved by the English High Court in Paterson v. Chadwick[1974] 2 All E.R. 772 at p. 775. Boreham J. found the above statement to be helpful, since it provided an explanation, rather than a definition of the words ‘......