Paul Fearon
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | MR. JUSTICE BLOFELD |
| Judgment Date | 13 November 1995 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1995] EWCA Crim J1113-10 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | 95/4916/W5 |
| Date | 13 November 1995 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Saul Andrew Divers
...144 It is clearly desirable for the sentencing court to make clear whether or not a reduction has been made for a plea of guilty (see R v Fearon (1996) 2 Cr App R(S) 25). As we cannot find anything in the papers to explain why, notwithstanding the plea of guilty, the judge imposed the maxim......
-
Joel Deer v R
...on the sentencing exercise, the learned judge stated that he took into account the guilty plea. This was the correct approach, as in R v Fearon (1996) 2 Cr App R (S) 25, the court stated that it is highly desirable in every case where an accused pleads guilty in the Crown Court for the sent......
-
R v Shane Tony P; R v Shane Tony Parkin
...it shall state in open court that it has done so." There was no such statement in the present case. 12 It has been said more than once (see R v Fearon [1996] 2 Cr App R(S) 25, and R v Aroride [1999] 2 Cr App R(S) 406) that it is highly desirable that a sentencing judge in every case makes i......
-
Tobare Aroride
...failed in its duty under subsection 18 (2) to state that fact in open court. 19 We emphasise also the decision of this court in the case of R v Fearon (1996) 2 Cr App R (S) 25, in which the court said that in that case the judge had not referred to the fact that the appellant had pleaded gu......
Request a trial to view additional results