Payne v British Time Recorder Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1921
Year1921

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • Central Securities (Holdings) Bhd v Haron bin Mohamed Zaid
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Green v Berliner
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... , That a person who was the managing director of the company owning the place of entertainment and had the general ... that he was not actually present at any time during the entertainment, was to be deemed the keeper of ... Thomas v. Moore [ 1918 ] 1 K. B. 555 and Payne v. British Time Recorder Co. [ 1921 ] 2 K. B. 1 ... ...
  • Omni Secs Ltd v Deloitte & Touche
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 6 February 2001
    ...[1910] 1 K.B. 327; (1909), 79 L.J.K.B. 363, dicta of Fletcher-Moulton, L.J. applied. (3) Payne v. British Time Recorder Co. Ltd., [1921] 2 K.B. 1; (1921), 90 L.J.K.B. 445, applied. Legislation construed: Grand Court Rules, O.4, r.3(1): ‘Where two or more causes of action are pending in the ......
  • Major General Antony Anderson Chief of Defence Staff v Jamaica Defence Board; Independent Commission of Investigations
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 30 July 2018
    ...which it was a party. See: Attorney-General v. Newcastle-upon-Tyne 1897 2 Q.B. 384 (C,A.) and In re La Societe Les Affreteurs Reunis [1921] 2K.B. 1 (C.A.). The Duncan v Cammel Laird decision was in 1942. So at this time there was a clear bias or privilege in favour of the Crown in relatio......
  • Get Started for Free