Peach and Another, v Bath

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of the King's Bench
Judgment Date02 May 1764
Date02 May 1764

English Reports Citation: 97 E.R. 936

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH

Peach and Another
and
Bath

S. C. 1 Black. 471.

Referred to, The Charkich, 1873, L. R. 4 Ad. & E. 89; R. v. Keyn, 1876, 2 Ex. D. 130; West Rand Central Gold-Mining Company v. R. [1905], 2 K. B. 407.

[1478] triquet and others, verms bath. peach and another, versus bath. uut*., Saturday, 2d May, 1764. [S. C. 1 Black. 471.] English secretary to a foreign minister protected from arrest. [3 Durn. 80.] [Referred to, The Charkieh, 1873, L. R. 4 Ad. & E. 89; B. v. Keyn, 1876, 2 Ex. D. 130; West Band Central Gold-Mining Company v. B. [1905], 2 K. B. 407.] Mr. Blackstone, Mr. Thurlow, and Mr. Dunning, on behalf of the plaintiffs, shewed cause why the bill of Middlesex in each of these causes should not be set aside, and the bail-bond be cancelled. The rule was made upon affidavits "of the defendant's being a domestic servant of a foreign minister; arid having taken all the proper steps to intitle him to the privilege of such domestics." The only question was, " whether the defendant (Christopher Bath) was really and truly and bona fide a domestic servant of Count Haslang, the Bavarian minister :" or, " whether his service was only colourable, and a mere sham and pretence calculated to protect him from the just demands of his creditors." On the part of the defendant, it was sworn, " that he was regularly appointed by Count Haslang, to be one of his English secretaries, at 301. per arm. for board and lodging, &c." And he swore to actual attendance and actual service, at several times, at the count's house ; and writing, copying and carrying several letters and memorials : in short, the defendant's affidavits were so framed, that every thing was sworn that ia absolute strictness could be required, to bring him within the description of a domestic servant to this minister. On the part of the plaintiffs, it appeared, that Bath was a mercer in Dublin, about seven or eight years ago; that he had afterwards been a commissary of stores abroad, and was now upon half-pay as such, at 15s. per day : that he speaks only English : that he had never eat nor lodged in the count's house, nor received any wages : (but as to the wages, it appeared that there were not yet so much as half a year's wages become due). It was also sworn, very generally " that whilst he carried on trade in Ireland, he bought goods in England, and sold them in Ireland." Mr. Blackstone observed that the Act of Parliament of 7 Ann. c. 12...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
31 cases
  • Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Araya
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 28 February 2020
    ...Habana, 175 U.S. 677 (1900); Trendtex Trading Corp. v. Central Bank of Nigeria, [1977] 1 Q.B. 529; Triquet v. Bath (1764), 3 Burr. 1478, 97 E.R. 936; Chung Chi Cheung v. The King, [1939] A.C. 160; The Ship “North” v. The King (1906), 37 S.C.R. 385; Reference as to Whether Members of the Mil......
  • Belhaj and another v Straw and Others; Rahmatullah v Ministry of Defence and another (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 17 January 2017
    ...It used to be said that customary international law is part of the common law. The sentiment dates back to Lord Mansfield in Triquet v Bath (1764) 3 Burr 1478, 1481 and Blackstone's Commentaries, Bk IV, Chapter 5. The classic example in their day was the recognition at common law of the imm......
  • R v Margaret Jones; Swain v DPP; R v Arthur Milling; R v Toby Olditch; R v Philip Pritchard
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 29 March 2006
    ... ... proposition, for which there is indeed old and high authority: see, for example, Triquet v Bath (1764) 3 Burr 1478 , 1481 Blackstone's Commentaries, Bk IV, Chap 5, p 67; Duke of Brunswick v ... : "(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack … ... ...
  • Al-Malki and Another v Reyes
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 18 October 2017
    ... ... In Triquet v Bath (1764) 3 Burrow 1478, 1480 , Lord Mansfield described the Act as declaratory of the law of nations, and it remained in force until 1964. The ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2ND SEPTEMBER 1998
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1998, December 1998
    • 1 December 1998
    ...Yearbook of International Law 1 at p 53. 5 Commentaries vol. 4 p. 55. 6 Bavot v Barbuit (1737) Cases t. Talb. 281; Triquet v Bath(1764) 3 Burr. 1478; 97 ER 936. 7 West Rand Central Gold Mining Co v R [1905] 2 KB 391 at 406—407. Chow Hung Ching v The King(1949) 77 CLR 449 at 462. 8 [1939] AC......