Peacock and another v Custins and another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 14 November 2000 |
| Date | 14 November 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
Macepark (Whittlebury) Ltd v Jeffrey Ian Sargeant and Another
...which, amongst other things, consider the question of whether and to what extent there is a doctrine of "ancillary" use. 31 In Peacock v Custins [2002] 1 WLR 1815 the Court of Appeal dealt with an express grant of a right of way "in connection with the use and enjoyment of" the dominant la......
- EDF Energy Netwroks Plc v BOH Ltd & Others
-
Massey v Boulden
...submits, is the effect of the governing authorities, most notably Harris v Flower (1904) 74 LJCt 127, Graham v Philcox [1984] 1 QB 747, Peacock v Custins [2001] EGLR 87 and Das v Linden Mews Limited [2002] EWCA Civ 590. 38 Mr Harrison argues the contrary. His wider submission is that there ......
-
Wall v Collins and another
...some usual offices on [Blackacre] connected with the buildings on [Whiteacre].” 52 He also referred to the judgment of Schiemann LJ in Peacock v Custins [2002] 1 WLR 1815, 1824 (in which the court refused to allow a way granted for agricultural use of 15 acres, to be used for an additional ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Particular Easements and Examples of Analogous Remedies of Relevance to Development
...only one and a half inches clearance on each side. The road itself 1 (1878) 8 Ch 415 at 420, per Jessel MR. See also Peacock v Custins [2002] 1 WLR 1815 at [30], per Schiemann LJ, who stated, ‘We, of course, accept … that the physical characteristics of the area at the time of the grant con......