Penfold v Newman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1922
Date1922
CourtDivisional Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Sammon v Byrne
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court (Irish Free State)
    • 15 July 1926
    ...namely, by altering the liability for repairs. Decision of the High Court affirmed. Observations of Salter, J., in Penfoldv. NewmanELR, [1922] 1 K. B. 645. applied. Elliottv. EllisIR. [1923] 2 I. R. 45, and Bourne v. LittonELR, [1924] 2 K. B. 10, distinguished. The maxim, "Quilibet potest r......
  • Fredco Estates Ltd v Bryant
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 9 November 1960
    ...notice must be regarded as invalid. In support of that submission we were referred to some words of Mr. Justice Salter in the case of Penfold v Newman, reported in 1922 1 King's Bench at page 645. Mr. Justice Salter there said at page 649: "The provisions of section 3, sub-section 2 (3), of......
  • Elliott v Ellis
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Irish Free State)
    • 21 December 1923
    ...which were set out in the notice:—Held (affirming the King's Bench Division), that the notice was not invalid. Penfold v. NewmanELR ([1922] 1 K. B. 645) discussed. C. A., I. F. S., Elliott and Ellis Notice of increase - Validity - Disputed items - Agreement between parties - Increase of R......