Penfold v Newman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1922
Year1922
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Sammon v Byrne
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court (Irish Free State)
    • July 15, 1926
    ...namely, by altering the liability for repairs. Decision of the High Court affirmed. Observations of Salter, J., in Penfoldv. NewmanELR, [1922] 1 K. B. 645. applied. Elliottv. EllisIR. [1923] 2 I. R. 45, and Bourne v. LittonELR, [1924] 2 K. B. 10, distinguished. The maxim, "Quilibet potest r......
  • Fredco Estates Ltd v Bryant
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • November 9, 1960
    ...notice must be regarded as invalid. In support of that submission we were referred to some words of Mr. Justice Salter in the case of Penfold v Newman, reported in 1922 1 King's Bench at page 645. Mr. Justice Salter there said at page 649: "The provisions of section 3, sub-section 2 (3), of......
  • Clydebank Investment Company v Marshall
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • July 12, 1927
    ...sees. 1 and 2; Cf. Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1923 (13 and 14 Geo. V. cap. 32), sec 19 (b). 3 Penfold v. NewmanELR, [1922] 1 K. B. 645, Shearman, J., at p. 650, Salter, J., at p. 4 Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1920, sec. 18 (1), voce‘Rates’;......
  • Elliott v Ellis
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Irish Free State)
    • December 21, 1923
    ...which were set out in the notice:—Held (affirming the King's Bench Division), that the notice was not invalid. Penfold v. NewmanELR ([1922] 1 K. B. 645) discussed. C. A., I. F. S., Elliott and Ellis Notice of increase - Validity - Disputed items - Agreement between parties - Increase of R......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT