Penfold v Newman
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1922 |
Year | 1922 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Sammon v Byrne
...namely, by altering the liability for repairs. Decision of the High Court affirmed. Observations of Salter, J., in Penfoldv. NewmanELR, [1922] 1 K. B. 645. applied. Elliottv. EllisIR. [1923] 2 I. R. 45, and Bourne v. LittonELR, [1924] 2 K. B. 10, distinguished. The maxim, "Quilibet potest r......
-
Fredco Estates Ltd v Bryant
...notice must be regarded as invalid. In support of that submission we were referred to some words of Mr. Justice Salter in the case of Penfold v Newman, reported in 1922 1 King's Bench at page 645. Mr. Justice Salter there said at page 649: "The provisions of section 3, sub-section 2 (3), of......
-
Clydebank Investment Company v Marshall
...sees. 1 and 2; Cf. Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1923 (13 and 14 Geo. V. cap. 32), sec 19 (b). 3 Penfold v. NewmanELR, [1922] 1 K. B. 645, Shearman, J., at p. 650, Salter, J., at p. 4 Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1920, sec. 18 (1), voce‘Rates’;......
-
Elliott v Ellis
...which were set out in the notice:—Held (affirming the King's Bench Division), that the notice was not invalid. Penfold v. NewmanELR ([1922] 1 K. B. 645) discussed. C. A., I. F. S., Elliott and Ellis Notice of increase - Validity - Disputed items - Agreement between parties - Increase of R......