Perry (Howard E.) & Company Ltd v British Railways Board

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1980
Year1980

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Club Cruise Entertainment & Travelling Services Europe v Department of Transport (The Van Gogh)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 Noviembre 2008
    ...is inconsistent with the true owner's right. 47 Mr Lord placed considerable reliance on the decision of Megarry V-C in Perry v British Railways Board [1980] 1 WLR 1375. However, quite apart from the fact that that was a case where the defendant was in possession of the goods, so that it is ......
  • Bear Necessities Daycare Ltd v Lancashire Fuels 4 U Ltd (First Respondent) Mr Peter Ogg (Second Respondent)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 31 Marzo 2015
    ...in the past, or that it would do so in the future. 33 It is true, as Mr Taskeen pointed out, that, in the case of Howard E. Perry & Co Ltd v British Railways Board [1980] 2 All E R 579, Sir Robert Megarry, V-C, made clear that the fact there was no danger that goods would be disposed of......
  • Kota Sejarah, Owners of Cargo on board v Kota Sejarah, Owners of
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1991
  • The "Kota Sejarah"
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 Agosto 1990
    ...Philp & Co (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 1 (folld) Beauchamp v Turrell [1952] 2 QB 207 (refd) Howard E Perry & Co Ltd v British Railways Board [1980] 1 WLR 1375; [1980] 2 All ER 579 (refd) Lady Gwendolen, The [1965] P 294 (refd) Lennard's Carrying Co Ltd v Asiatic Petroleum Co Ltd [1915] AC 705 (refd)......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • VINDICATIO The Missing Remedy?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 Diciembre 2016
    ...at the very least, a duty to allow P to come onto the premises to remove the property: Howard E Perry & Co Ltd v British Railways Board[1980] 1 WLR 1375. 41 Civil Procedure Rules, Practice Direction – Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols at paras 3 and 6. 42 Jeremy Waldron, “How Law Protects Di......
  • JUDICIAL AND JUDICIOUS EXERCISE OF DISCRETION
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition J
    • 6 Febrero 2019
    ...in reaching a correct decision and with reference only and reasons connected with the case. See Howard E. Perry Ltd. v. B.R.B. (1980) 2 All E.R. 579 at pp. 585 - 586; 587, University of Lagos v. Aigoro (1985) 1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1) 143; University of Lagos v. Olaniyan (1985) 1 S.C. 297; (1985) ......