Perry v Clissold

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1907
Date1907
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
101 cases
  • Griffiths v Minister for Lands, Planning and Environment
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 de maio de 2008
    ...to the interpretation of statutes containing powers of that kind 159. The general rule of construction was stated by Griffith CJ in Clissold v Perry160 to be ‘that [statutes] are not to be construed as interfering with vested interests unless that intention is manifest’. In Bropho v Western......
  • Western Australian Planning Commission v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 de dezembro de 2004
    ...case, no question respecting s 37 arises. 97 Nor does there arise the issue considered by this Court and then by the Privy Council inPerry v Clissold109. That issue concerned the construction of New South Wales legislation which required a valuation to be made upon disclosure to the Ministe......
  • Barbara Constantine Acting herein by her lawful attorney on Record Jim Lockhart Plaintiff v Eric Hackshaw Defendant [ECSC]
    • St Vincent
    • High Court (Saint Vincent)
    • 31 de maio de 2000
    ...had been openly on the Land using as his own and not accounting to anyone since at least 1971. The law has been neatly expressed in Perry v Cussold (1906) AC as follows: It cannot be disputed that a person in possession of land in the assumed character of owner and exercising peaceably the ......
  • Sheila Schulterbrandt v Gertrude Callwood Coakley and Another
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 23 de agosto de 2004
    ...an overriding interest as provided for under section 28(g) of the Registered Land Act. 49 In my judgment this case is on all fours with Perry v Clissold1907 A.C. per Ld. McNaughten and applied in Burton v Elvin at page 121: ‘It cannot be disputed that a person in possession of land in the a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • ADF Offensive Cyberspace Operations and Australian Domestic Law: Proprietary and Constitutional Implications
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 47-4, December 2019
    • 1 de dezembro de 2019
    ...Hayne JJ).21. Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v Elliot (1946) 74 CLR 204, 226 (Dixon J).22. Entick v Carrington (1765) 95 ER 807; Perry v Clissold [1907] AC 73; Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR635.23. See, eg, Austr alian Provincial Assurance Co Ltd v Coroneo (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 700; Holland vHodgson (......
  • The Toohey Legacy: Rights and Freedoms, Compassion and Honour
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 de janeiro de 2018
    ...a list of activities permitted on, or in relation to, areas of land or waters. 56 McNeil, Common Law Aboriginal Title (1989) 196-204. 57 (1907) AC 73. 58 See Toohey J at 178, 206, 209-10, 211; see Simon Young, The Trouble with Tradition Native Title and Cultural Change. (Federation Press, 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT