Perry v Clissold
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1907 |
Date | 1907 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
101 cases
-
Griffiths v Minister for Lands, Planning and Environment
...to the interpretation of statutes containing powers of that kind 159. The general rule of construction was stated by Griffith CJ in Clissold v Perry160 to be ‘that [statutes] are not to be construed as interfering with vested interests unless that intention is manifest’. In Bropho v Western......
-
Western Australian Planning Commission v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd
...case, no question respecting s 37 arises. 97 Nor does there arise the issue considered by this Court and then by the Privy Council inPerry v Clissold109. That issue concerned the construction of New South Wales legislation which required a valuation to be made upon disclosure to the Ministe......
-
Barbara Constantine Acting herein by her lawful attorney on Record Jim Lockhart Plaintiff v Eric Hackshaw Defendant [ECSC]
...had been openly on the Land using as his own and not accounting to anyone since at least 1971. The law has been neatly expressed in Perry v Cussold (1906) AC as follows: It cannot be disputed that a person in possession of land in the assumed character of owner and exercising peaceably the ......
-
Sheila Schulterbrandt v Gertrude Callwood Coakley and Another
...an overriding interest as provided for under section 28(g) of the Registered Land Act. 49 In my judgment this case is on all fours with Perry v Clissold1907 A.C. per Ld. McNaughten and applied in Burton v Elvin at page 121: ‘It cannot be disputed that a person in possession of land in the a......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
ADF Offensive Cyberspace Operations and Australian Domestic Law: Proprietary and Constitutional Implications
...Hayne JJ).21. Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v Elliot (1946) 74 CLR 204, 226 (Dixon J).22. Entick v Carrington (1765) 95 ER 807; Perry v Clissold [1907] AC 73; Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR635.23. See, eg, Austr alian Provincial Assurance Co Ltd v Coroneo (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 700; Holland vHodgson (......
-
The Toohey Legacy: Rights and Freedoms, Compassion and Honour
...a list of activities permitted on, or in relation to, areas of land or waters. 56 McNeil, Common Law Aboriginal Title (1989) 196-204. 57 (1907) AC 73. 58 See Toohey J at 178, 206, 209-10, 211; see Simon Young, The Trouble with Tradition Native Title and Cultural Change. (Federation Press, 2......