Persuasive or Pipe Dream? The Potential Influence of the Feminist Judgments Project on Future Judical Decision Making
Author | Kate Webber Nuñez |
Position | Professor of Law, Nova Southeastern University, Shepard Broad College of Law |
Pages | 323-365 |
The Feminist Judgments Project (“FJP” or the “Project”) rewrites existing judicial
opinions from a feminist perspective. This article explores whether and how the
to change the law by revealing unconscious bias and opening judicial minds to
and evaluates the FJP using theories from political science. In light of the increasingly
conservative judiciary and the Republican administration, the attitudinal and
FJP draws on social facts highlighted by the #MeToo and LGBTQ rights movements
and whether the Project thereby creates the conditions for social construction and
resultant legal change. It also uses theories on displacement to present a critique
path of persuasion is somewhat narrow and limited, but possible.
Feminist Judgments Project, Feminism and Political Science, Historical
© 2020 Kate Webber Nuñez, published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
A. Methods and Outcomes ................................................................
B. Goals and Assumptions ................................................................
A. The Problem of the Ideological Models .......................................
B. Historical Institutionalism: Theory .............................................. 336
9 Br. J. Am. Leg. Studies (2020)
C. Empirical Support for the Relevance of the Law ........................
D. Implications for the FJP ..............................................................
................................
B. Social Construction ......................................................................
C. Modern Decisions ........................................................................
A. Social Construction in the FJP: #MeToo and the Law ................
B. Tax Opinions and Continued Social Recognition of LGBTQ Rights
A. The Problem of Originalists ........................................................
B. Displacement ................................................................................
C. Alternative Methods of Persuasion ..............................................
324
3Feminist Judgments:
Rewritten Opinions of the Supreme CourtFeminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax
Opinions6
E.g. Introduction to the
in
Id. Introduction to the Feminist
Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions Project in
See also Women’s Court of Canada Act
and Rules
Series Projects
supra
Id.
Id.
Rewriting Judicial Opinions and the Feminist Scholarly Project
See also supra
supra
325
To continue reading
Request your trial