Philipps v Philipps and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1875 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
75 cases
-
McAteer, Aine and Daniel McAteer and The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and Cherith Craig
...whom it is directed on their guard, and tell them what is the case which they will have to meet (per Cotton LJ in Philipps v Philipps (1878) 4 QBD 127, p 139. “Material” means necessary for the purpose of formulating a complete cause of action; and if any one material statement is omitted, ......
-
Mccann v Switzerland Insuranceaustralia Ltd
...and Gaudron JJ. 88 [1999] NSWCA 310 [75]. 89 [1999] NSWCA 310 [87]. 90 [1999] NSWCA 310 [79]. 91 See, for example, Philipps v Philipps (1878) 4 QBD 127; Bruce v Odhams Press Ltd [1936] 1 KB 697; Ritz Hotel v Charles of the Ritz [No 20] (1988) 14 NSWLR 124; Rubenstein v Truth and Sportsman L......
-
Mount Elizabeth Health Centre Pte Ltd v Mount Elizabeth Hospital Ltd
...defendants on their guard and tell them what they have to meet when the case comes on for trial' (per Cotton LJ in Philipps v Philipps (1878) 4 QBD 127 at 139). 54 Lord Donovan at 580 further said: “If the claim is one which cannot with justice be sprung upon the defendants at the trial it ......
-
Algosaibi Bros v Saad Invs
...2 Lloyd”s Rep. 347, followed. (28) OJSC Oil Co.Yugraneft v. Abramovich, [2008] EWHC 2613 (Comm), applied. (29) Philipps v. PhilippsELR(1878), 4 Q.B.D. 127, referred to. (30) Polly Peck Intl.PLC, No.2, Re, [1998] 3 All E.R. 812; [1998] 2 BCLC 185, distinguished. (31) Powell v. Thompson, [199......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...2 E.C.S.L.R. 199. .................................. 389 Philip Kanu & Anor. v. R. (1952) 14 W.A.C.A. 30. 369 Philips v. Philips, (1878) 4 Q.B.D. 127. Piaro v. Tenalo (1976) 12 S.C. 31 ............................................................................. 553 Prehn v. Royal Bank of L......
-
MATERIAL FACT FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASCERTAINING CAUSE OF ACTION
...Rivers State Suit No. CA/PH/185/95; (1997) 9 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 522) 642 at 663 - 664. (5) "Cotton L.J observed in Phillips v. Phillips (1878) 4 Q.B.D 127 at 139 that: - "The word "material" means necessary for the purpose of formulating a complete cause of action and if any one material stateme......
-
MATERIAL IN RELATION TO PLEADING OF MATERIAL FACT
...the other party be on his guard, and tell him all that he will have to meet when the case comes up for trial. See Phillips v. Phillips (1878) 4 Q.B.D. 127 at 139 wherein Cotton, L.J. observed as follows: "The word material means necessary for the purpose of formulating cause of action and......