Phillip Alexander Securities and Futures Ltd v Bamberger

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeWaller J,Leggatt,Morritt,Brooke L JJ.
Judgment Date12 July 1996
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date12 July 1996
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 April 2010
    ...that this Court should do so. He submits that the decision, particularly that at first instance by Waller J, in Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Ltd v Bamberger [1997] I.L.Pr 73, should be followed. In that case a German court had refused to recognise an arbitration agreement because......
  • AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 May 2011
    ...162 Mr White also relied on Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Limited v. Bamberger, Theele, Kefer, Riedel, Franz and Gilhaus [1997] 1 L Pr 73 (Waller J and CA). In that case the English court granted anti-suit injunctions against German consumers, restraining them from pursuing court......
  • National Navigation Company v Endesa Generacion SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 December 2009
    ...[1988] ECR 654. Marc Rich & Co AG v Societa Italiana Impianti SpAECAS (Case C-190/89) [1991] ECR I-3855. Philip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd v Bamberger [1996] CLC 1757; [1997] IL Pr 73. Sennar, The (No. 2)WLR [1985] 1 WLR 490. Through Transport Mutual Insurance Association (Euras......
  • National Navigation Company v Endesa Generacion SA [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 1 April 2009
    ...academic debate; see, by way of example, Dicey, Morris & Collins 64 and Briggs & Rees 65. In Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Limited v Bamberger and Others 66, Waller J (as he then was) expressed the view (obiter) that a ruling of a foreign court in a Member State, as to the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • THE USE AND ABUSE OF ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTIONS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...at [14]. 10Toepfer International GmbH v Molino Boschi[1996] 1 Lloyd's Rep 510; Philip Alexander Securities and Futures Ltd v Bamberger[1996] CLC 1757. 11 Adrian Briggs, “Anti-Suit Injunctions and Utopian Ideals” (2004) 120 LQR 529 at 530. 12 David Joseph, Jurisdiction and Arbitration Agreem......
  • ENFORCING ENGLISH JURISDICTION CLAUSES IN BILLS OF LADING
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...Reynolds, supra n 57. 98 Despite a note of caution by the Court of Appeal in Phillip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd v Bamberger[1996] CLC 1757 at 1789; Through Transport Mutual Insurance Association (Eurasia) Ltd v New India Assurance Co Ltd (The Hari Bhum) (No 1)[2005] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 67......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT