Phillips Higgins v Harper
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1954 |
| Date | 1954 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
-
Kleinwort Benson Ltd. v. Lincoln (City), (1998) 233 N.R. 201 (HL)
...155 (Aust.), refd to. [paras. 61, 169]. Diplock, Re, [1948] Ch. 465 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 76, 132]. Phillips-Higgins v. Harper, [1954] 1 Q.B. 411 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Beauchamp (Earl) v. Winn (1873), L.R. 6 H.L. 223 (H.L.), refd to. [paras. 77, 147]. Donoghue v. Stevenson, [1932] A.C.......
- Tenaga Nasional Bhd v Kamarstone Sdn Bhd
-
Moore (plaintiff) v Moore and Others
...OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S7 WYLIE IRISH LAND LAW 4ED PARA 23.25 BRADY & KERR LIMITATIONS OF ACTION 2ED 196-198 PHILLIPS-HIGGINS v HARPER 1954 1 QB 411 CANNY LIMITATION OF ACTIONS 2010 PARA 10-23 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 1957 S72(2) KEATING ON PROBATE 3ED 2007 17-01 REGISTRATION OF TITLE ACT 1964 S......
-
Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs
...so ensure its protection under EU law. They submit that section 32(1)(c) should be widely construed, contrary to the authority of Phillips-Higgins v Harper [1954] 1 QB 411, a first-instance decision which has however stood and been followed for over half a century. They submit that section......
Request a trial to view additional results