Pierce v Bemis (Lusitania)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1985
Date1985
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Argentum Exploration v The Silver
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 Octubre 2022
    ... ... [1919] AC 16, 24–25 ; Court Line v The King (1945) 78 Lloyd's Rep 390 , 396 Col 2 ; Pierce" v Bemis (the Lusitania) [1986] 1 QB 384, 388D ... 64 A cargo also becomes “derelict\xE2" ... ...
  • Re ""La Lavia""
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 Enero 1999
    ...237. Pine Valley Development v. Minister for the Environment [1987] I.R. 23; [1987] I.L.R.M. 747. Pierce v. Bemis [1986] Q.B. 386; [1986] 2 W.L.R. 501; [1986] 1 All E.R. 1011. The Earl of Eglington (1855) 8 L.T. 178; 166 E.R. 989. The Industry (1835) Hagg. 203. The Santa Maria de la Rosa (U......
  • Ontario v. Mar-Dive Corp. et al., (1996) 20 O.T.C. 81 (GD)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • 20 Diciembre 1996
    ...Davie v. Ship Young Hustler No. 1 (1962), 32 D.L.R.(2d) 470 (Ex. Ct.), refd to. [Appendix]. Pierce v. Bemis; Ship Lusitania, [1986] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 132, refd to. Simon v. Taylor et al., [1975] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 338 (Singapore H.C.), refd to. [Appendix]. Ship Humboldt v. Ship Escort No. 2 (1914)......
  • The Queen (on the application of David Knight) v Secretary of State for Transport Edward Huzzey and Another (Interested Parties)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 10 Julio 2017
    ... ... in Pierce v Bemis, The Lusitania [1986] 1 QB 384 at pp.391 and 398. The statutory scheme is therefore of ... ...
1 books & journal articles
  • THE LAW OF ABANDONMENT AND THE PASSING OF PROPERTY IN TRASH
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...vessel, could not therefore be held liable for the wreck removal expenses. For a more recent example, see Pierce v Bemis (The Lusitania) [1986] QB 384. 59 A H Hudson, “Is Divesting Abandonment Possible at Common Law?” (1984) 100 LQR 110 at 113 et seq. 60 In particular, these cases suggest t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT