Plumstead Board of Works v Spackman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1884
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 cases
  • Vine v National Dock Labour Board
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 December 1956
    ...and normally cited on this topic. I will not set them out, but I have in mind the Earl of Selborne, L.C.'s opinion in Spackman v. The Plumstead District Board of Works, 10 App. Cas. 229 at p. 240; Lord Loreburn, L.C.'s opinion in Board of Education v. Rice [1911] 179 at p. 182; and that of......
  • Ridge v Baldwin
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Manchester Legal Aid Committee F3 ; General Medical Council v. Spackman F4 ; Taylor v. National Assistance Board F5 ; Pyx Granite Co. Ltd. v ... Wandsworth Board of Works. F52 Where an owner had failed to give proper notice to the Board they ... Plumstead District Board of Works. F62 ... I shall now turn to a different class ... ...
  • Ridge (A.P.) v Baldwin and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 March 1963
    ...an official architect in fixing a building line was stated in somewhat similar terms in Spackman v, Plumstead District Board of Works, 10 App. Cas. 229. 17 I shall now turn to a different class of case—deprivation of membership of a professional or social body. In Wood v. Woad, L.R. 9 Ex. 1......
  • S157/2002 v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 4 February 2003
    ...at 365-367. 28 (1990) 170 CLR 321 at 367. 29Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 at 142 [166] per Hayne J. 30 (1885) 10 App Cas 229. 31 (1885) 10 App Cas 229 at 32 (1885) 10 App Cas 229 at 240. 33Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 at......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Contractual Discretion and Administrative Discretion: A Unified Analysis
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 68-4, July 2005
    • 1 July 2005
    ...Council as exceeding the limits of its discretion: RvRoberts[1924]2 KB 695.44 See for example Spackman vPlumstead Board ofWorks (1885) 10App Cas 229, where the Metropo-litan Board of Works was described as an ‘impartial’and ‘disinterested’public body,and its super-intending architect, whose......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT