PO (Points based scheme: maintenance: loans)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeC M G OCKELTON,DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Judgment Date28 August 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] UKAIT 47
CourtAsylum and Immigration Tribunal
Date28 August 2009

[2009] UKAIT 47

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Before:

Mr C M G Ockelton, Deputy President of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal

Designated Immigration Judge Macleman

Between
PO
Appellant
and
The secretary of state for the Home Department
Respondent
Representation

For the Appellant: Mr R Gibb, Immigration Advisory Service, Glasgow

For the Respondent: Mr P. Laverty, Home Office Presenting Officer.

PO (Points based scheme: maintenance: loans) Nigeria

The terms of the guidance applicable to points-based scheme applications make it clear that the documents accompanying the application must show the required sums as credit balances. If the sums are sufficient, it does not appear to matter that they have been lent to the applicant. But it is not sufficient to show merely that a loan has been arranged.

DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1

The Appellant, a national of Nigeria, appealed to the Tribunal against the decision of the respondent on 21 March 2009 refusing him leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 1 (Post Study Work) Migrant. An immigration judge dismissed his appeal. The appellant sought and obtained an order for reconsideration. Thus the matter comes before us.

2

A number of matters were raised before the Immigration Judge, who decided, amongst other things, clearly correctly, that because paragraph 245AA of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules HC 395 incorporates the guidance there specified, in order to comply with the immigration rules an applicant must comply with the guidance. The issue in this case relates to the amount of money available to the appellant with which to satisfy the maintenance requirements of the points based scheme. The relevant requirement in the appellant's case, and the appellant's attempt to satisfy that requirement is clearly and succinctly set out in Mr Gibb's grounds for reconsideration at para 7 and 8 as follows:-

“7. That as the petitioner's application was made before 31 October 2008 the respondent's policy states that he must have had £800 available to him at the time of his application. It also stated that the documents produced to evidence the availability of these funds must be dated no earlier than a month before his application. ….

8. That the appellant submitted bank statements in the required form and dated within the specified period in support of his application. The balance in his account was less than £800. Nevertheless, he had an overdraft facility available, which allowed him to withdraw an additional...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • FA and AA (PBS effect of Pankina) Nigeria
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 25 August 2010
    ...to withdraw funds for their own purposes or indeed the source of the funds see: PO (Points Based scheme; maintenance: loans) Nigeria [2009] UKAIT 00047 and AM and SS (PBS – Tier 1 – joint accounts) Pakistan [2010] UKUT 169 (IAC). 24 Here the IJ seems to have accepted the explanation that th......
  • IK (Immigration Rules – construction – purpose)
    • United Kingdom
    • Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
    • 4 November 2009
    ...be at least £2,800 or £800 as appropriate).” 26 As the Tribunal recently said in PO (Points based scheme: maintenance: loans) Nigeria [2009] UKAIT 00047, this “is a simple and readily intelligible requirement. Documents which fail to show a balance at the required level simply are not evide......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2009-12-31, [2010] UKAIT 2 (IK (Immigration Rules, construction, purpose))
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 31 December 2009
    ...be at least £2,800 or £800 as appropriate).” 26. As the Tribunal recently said in PO (Points based scheme: maintenance: loans) Nigeria [2009] UKAIT 00047, this “is a simple and readily intelligible requirement. Documents which fail to show a balance at the required level simply are not evid......
  • Ejifugha (Tier 4 – funds – credit)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 9 May 2011
    ...aside the decision of the FtT, we turned to re-make the decision. In the case of PO (Points based scheme: maintenance: loans) Nigeria [2009] UKAIT 00047 which was decided before the case of Pankina, it was held that in order to comply with the Immigration Rules an applicant must comply with......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT