Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Company Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1947
Year1947
Date1947
CourtPrivy Council

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
183 cases
  • Minister of Transport v Pettitt
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Springfield Land Corporation (No 2) Pty Ltd v Queensland
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 May 2011
    ...‘the scheme underlying the acquisition’. This is associated with what was said by the Privy Council in Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Co Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands10. But, while acknowledging the absence of the expression from s 20 of the Acquisition Act, the arbitrator said ......
  • Waters and Others v Welsh Development Agency
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 29 April 2004
    ...palliative measure because of the environmental consequences of the Cardiff Bay barrage, following Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Co Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands [1947] AC 565. 13 The President answered the first issue in favour of the claimants. Rule 3 does not apply in this c......
  • Wilson v Liverpool Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 November 1970
    ... ... Court of Appeal (On appeal from the Lands Tribunal. 23. 2. 70.) ... MR. T. H. PIGOT, Q ... , in making their valuation, applied the Pointe Gourde principle, when they ought not to have ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...and 34 of the Act. This common law principle was laid down in Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Co Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands[1947] AC 565. The local case of Chew Ming Teck v Collector of Land Revenue[1988] SLR 118 had earlier made reference to the Pointe Gourde principle althou......