Porter v Magill

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL
Judgment Date13 December 2001
Neutral Citation[2001] UKHL 67
CourtHouse of Lords
Date13 December 2001
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1324 cases
  • R Amos v Maidstone Crown Court and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 November 2013
    ...might have some attraction to it if looked at de novo but one that was of course firmly rejected in Mudie itself. 27 He took us to Magill v Porter & Weeks [2002] 2 AC 357, at paragraphs 85 to 86, as an example of a case where measures were held to be compensatory and regulatory rather than ......
  • Dr Simon Kimmance v General Medical Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 May 2016
    ...was sufficient to raise a real possibility of bias in the classic sense articulated by Lord Hope at paragraph 103 of his speech in Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357. 20 There is, with respect, nothing whatever in this point. It amounts to no more than a generic grievance against persons invol......
  • Re Fortuna Dev Corporation
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 14 February 2008
    ...Phillips, [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1092; [1999] 2 All E.R. 961; [1999] 2 BCLC 1; (1999), 143 Sol. Jo. (L.B.) 155, applied. (7) Porter v. Magill, [2002] 2 A.C. 357; [2002] 1 All E.R. 465; [2001] UKHL 67, distinguished. Companies-minority shareholders-valuation of minority”s shares for sale to majorit......
  • R Ciaran McClean v First Secretary of State
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 October 2017
    ...Neither of the authorities on which Mr Chambers particularly relied in advancing it – the Fire Brigades UnionCase [1995] 2 AC 513 and Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357 – supports it. The Fire Brigades Unioncase concerned a situation in which the Crown's prerogative powers to set tariffs under......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 firm's commentaries
  • Employment Law Case Update ' July 2023
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 1 August 2023
    ...of it, the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the contents of these posts and applying the guidance in Magill v Porter [2001] UKHL 67 and other pertinent authorities, would not in the circumstances consider the lay member was biased in favour of the Claimant. The appeal wa......
  • UK Supreme Court clarifies arbitrator’s duty of disclosure when accepting multiple appointments in related arbitrations
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 2 December 2020
    ...Insurance Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 817. 4 [2018] EWCA Civ 817, paragraph 39. 5 Ibid, paragraph 49 (applying the test in Porter v Magil [2002] 2 AC 357, paragraph 103). 6 Ibid, paragraph 53. 7 Ibid, paragraph 53, quoting Dyson LJ in AMEC Capital Projects Ltd. v Whitefriars City Estates Ltd. [2005......
  • Court of Appeal Rules on the Application of Rules of Natural Justice to Adjudication
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 14 December 2004
    ...that there was a real possibility that the adjudicator was biased" (this being the test for apparent bias set out in Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67). So, the judge held the adjudicator's decision to be invalid. AMEC Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal refused Whitefriars's cross appeal, whi......
  • Halliburton v Chubb: The Future of Repeat Appointments
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 14 November 2019
    ...and impartial observer, having considered the facts, conclude that there is a real possibility the tribunal was biased? [Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357] The court dismissed the challenge on the basis that accepting the Transocean appointments did not give rise to an appearance of bias, as ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
26 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 November 2008
    ...Coplc [1987]1 Lloyd’s Rep.379 . . . . . . . . . . . . .96Pollitt vR (1992) 174CLR 558 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67, [2002] 2 AC 357. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160,252Practice Direction (1837) 7 Car & P 675, 173 ER296 . .......
  • Essential Daily Guidance for Proceedings Concerning Children
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Single Family Court: a Practitioner's Handbook - 2nd Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2017
    ...(Contact: Application by Grandparent) [1997] 1 FLR 793. 92 G v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council [1993] 1 FLR 805. 93 Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67, [2002] 2 AC 357 at [102]. 94 In re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No 2) [2000] EWCA Civ 350, [2001] 1 WLR 700. 95 Mulugeta Gua......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill How Judges Decide Cases: Reading, Writing and Analysing Judgments. 2nd Edition Contents
    • 29 August 2018
    ...Warner Goodman & Streat (A Firm) [2003] EWCA Crim 1013, [2003] PNLR 784, [2003] All ER (D) 400 (Jun) 213 Porter v Magill; Weeks v Magill [2001] UKHL 67, [2002] 2 AC 357, [2002] 2 WLR 37, [2002] 1 All ER 465 69, 70 Table of Cases xxiii Practice Direction (Court of Appeal: Citation of Authori......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Mental Health Law Preliminary Sections
    • 28 August 2014
    ...[2009] MHLR 154 49 M, ITW v Z and others, Re [2009] EWHC 2525 (Fam) 234 MA v SSH and Others [2012] UKUT 474 (AAC) 19 Magill v Porter [2001] UKHL 67 158 Masterman-Lister v Brutton & Co and Jewell & Home Counties Dairies [2003] 3 All ER 162, CA 227 MB v BEH MH NHS Trust [2011] UKUT 328 (AAC) ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT