Potters v Loppert
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1973 |
Year | 1973 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
39 cases
-
Thomson Hill Pte Ltd v Chang Erh and Another and Another Appeal
...status of a stakeholder is that of a trustee. However, this view of the matter was dissented from by Pennycuick VC in Potters v Loppert, [1973] Ch 399 who felt perplexed that Denning MR should on the one hand describe the stakeholder as a trustee and yet on the other hand say that the stake......
-
United Artists Singapore Theatres Pte Ltd & Another v Parkway Properties Pte Ltd & Another
...upon or after the conclusion of a contract (referred to as a ‘contract deposit’) was explained by Pennycuick V.C. in Potters v Loppert [1973] Ch 399. "I turn now to the law in relation to pre-contract deposits…Unless and until a contract is concluded, the prospective purchaser can require t......
-
Gribbon v Lutton
...deposit to a stakeholder in advance of a legally binding contract between the vendor and purchaser were considered by Pennycuick V-C in Potters v. Loppert [1973] Ch 399: "It is necessary for the understanding of this matter to recognise at the outset the difference between a pre-contract d......
- Kemajuan Perwira Management Corporation Sdn Bhd; Toh Theam Hock
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...and a deposit paid upon or after entry into a binding contract. Referring to Pennycuick VC in the English decision of Potters v Loppert[1973] Ch 399, the learned judge pointed to the fact that in the case of a pre-contract deposit (the former category), the payer could require the return of......