Powell and another v Boldaz and Others
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1997 |
Date | 1997 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd Claimant/Respondent v (1) Temujin International Ltd (2) Temujin Services Ltd (3) Hakkisan Finance Corporation Ltd 1st Applicant (4) Myrzaly Ltd 2nd Applicant (5) Norgulf Holdings Ltd (6) Incomeborts Ltd (7) Tigerkhan Ltd 3rd Applicant Defendants
...conspiracy. It is accepted by all that the conspiracy that is alleged in the pleading is unlawful means conspiracy. 73 In Powell and Another v Boldaz and Others 22 it was held that (a) it was neither pleaded, nor made out in the facts that the conspiracy was aimed or directed at the plainti......
-
D v East Berkshire Community Health _NHS Trust; K and another v Dewsbury Healthcare _NHS Trust and another ; K and another v Oldham NHS Trust
...CC, Jarvis v Hampshire CC, Re G (a minor) [2000] 3 FCR 102, [2000] 4 All ER 504, [2001] 2 AC 619, [2000] 3 WLR 776, HL. Powell v Boladz (1997) 39 BMLR 35, CA. R (on the application of Greenfield) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept[2005] UKHL 14, [2005] 1 WLR Robertson v Turnbull 1982 SC......
-
D v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust; K and another v Dewsbury Healthcare NHS Trust and another; RK and another v Oldham NHS Trust and another
...Anderton v Clwyd CC, Jarvis v Hampshire CC[2000] 3 FCR 102, [2000] 4 All ER 504, [2001] 2 AC 619, [2000] 3 WLR 776, HL. Powell v Boladz (1997) 39 BMLR 35, CA. S v Gloucestershire CC, L v Tower Hamlets London BC[2000] 2 FCR 345, [2000] 3 All ER 346, [2001] Fam 313, [2001] 2 WLR 909, [2000] 1......
-
A B and Others v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust and another
...injury, the primary/secondary victim dichotomy (as counsel have labelled this issue). Powell v Boldaz 185 In Powell and Boldaz [1997] 39BMLR 35 the issue for decision in the Court of Appeal was whether doctors owed a duty of care to the parents of their deceased son in relation to events ......