Powell & Thomas v Evan Jones & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1905 |
| Year | 1905 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
34 cases
-
FHR European Ventures LLP v Mankarious
...followed in relation to a bribe paid to an agent by Sir Richard Henn Collins MR (with whom Stirling and Mathew LJJ agreed) in Powell & Thomas v Evan Jones & Co [1905] 1 KB 11, 22, where the principal was held entitled to an account for the bribe, but not to a declaration that the bribe was......
-
Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd
...342, 344. 69 The approach in Heiron 5 Ex D 319 and Lister LR 45 Ch D 1 was followed by the Court of Appeal in the civil case of Powell & Thomas v Evans Jones & Co [1905] 1 KB 11, and in the criminal case, Attorney-General's Reference (No 1 of 1985) [1986] 1 QB 491. Further, Lister 45 Ch D ......
-
Arbuthnott et al. v. Fagan and Feltrim Underwriting Agencies Ltd. et al., (1994) 173 N.R. 173 (HL)
...refd to. [para. 67]. De Bussche v. Alt (1878), 8 Ch. D. 286 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 83]. Powell & Thomas v. Jones (Evan) & Co., [1905] 1 K.B. 11 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Tarn v. Scanlan et al., [1928] A.C. 34 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 83]. Robinson v. National Bank of Scotland Ltd., [1......
-
Markel International Insurance Company v Surety Guarantee Consultants Ltd and Others
...appear to me to be sufficient to give rise to a relationship of trust and confidence. 225 Counsel for the Claimants referred me to Powell & Thomas v Evan Jones [1905] 1 KB 11 in which one of two reasons for the decision in that case was that a sub-agent owed duties as a fiduciary to the ult......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
UNAUTHORISED FIDUCIARY GAINS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
...which preferred the award of a personal remedy, see Metropolitan Bank v Heiron(1880) 5 Ex D 319; Powell & Thomas v Evan Jones & Co[1905] 1 KB 11; and Attorney General's Reference (No 1 of 1985)[1986] QB 491. 12 (1862) 10 HL Cas 26. 13 See, eg, the counsels' submission in Sinclair Investment......
-
Taxing the Proceeds of Crime
...1 (CA) — bribed purchasing agent; Andrews v Ramsay & Co. Ltd [1903] 2 KB 635 (CA) — bribed auctioneer; Powell & Thomas v Evan Jones & Co. [1905] 1 KB 11 (CA)—bribed borrower's agent; Attorney-General v Goddard (1929) 98 LJKB 743 — bribed police officer; Reading v R [1948] 2 KB 268 (1st inst......
-
MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF RESTITUTION
...(London, 1989). 7 (1890) 45 Ch.D. 1 (CA). 8 Ibid. 15 (Lindley, L.J.); cf. 12 (Cotton, L.J.). 9 Powell & Thomas v. Evans Jones & Co. [1905] 1 K.B. 11; Attorney-General v. Goddard(1929) 98 L.J.K.B. 743; Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines v. Denby[1987] 1 Lloyds Rep. 367. 10 R.P.Meagher, ......