Practice Direction (Civil Litigation: Case Management)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 25 January 1995 |
| Date | 25 January 1995 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Watson and Others v Croft Promo-Sport Ltd
...continuing effect of the decision in Shelfer. He quoted from the judgments of Sir Thomas Bingham MR and Millett LJ in Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 262, 278, 286 and 288. His conclusions were: “87 I am firmly of the view that this is not an appropriate case for granting an injunction. Firs......
-
Watson and Others v Croft Promo-Sport Ltd
...for what is ultimately a matter of judgment and discretion in the particular circumstances of the case. In Jaggard v. Sawyer (CA) [1995] 1 WLR 262 at 278 B Sir Thomas Bingham MR described the propositions set out in the judgment of AL Smith LJ as 'a good working rule'; and Millet LJ, havin......
-
FAI General Insurance Company Ltd v Godfrey Merrett Robertson Ltd
...1056. Home Office v HarmanELR [1983] 1 AC 280. Plant v PlantUNK [1998] 1 BCLC 38. Practice Direction (Civil Litigation: Case Management) [1995] 1 WLR 262. Practice Direction (Witness Statements: Inspection) [1992] 1 WLR 1157. R v Governor of Lewes Prison, exparte DoyleELR [1917] 2 KB 254. S......
-
Gio Personal Investment Services Ltd v Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and Indemnity Association Ltd and Others (FAI General Insurance Company Ltd intervening)
...stand as the evidence in chief of the witness when called at trial. By the Practice Direction (Civil Litigation: Case Management) [1995] 1 WLR 262 it has since been provided (by paragraph 3) that "Unless otherwise ordered, every witness statement shall stand as the evidence in chief of the......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Electronic discovery issues: disclosure requirements in Britain, Canada, and Australia.
...sterling] by way of damages and costs. (16.) RSC Order 24, Rules 8 and 13; SCR Part 23, Rule 4. (17.) In re Halcon (1989), RPC 1 (18.) [1995] 1 W.L.R. 262 (19.) SCR Part 23, Rule 1(d). (20.) Subrule 30.02(1). (21.) Subrule 30.02(2). (22.) See Halcon Int'l Inc. v. Shell Transport and Trading......