Practice Direction (Contempt: Reporting Restrictions)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1982 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Ex parte Central Independent Television Plc and Others
...the reporting of such; and had made the order in a manner which contravened Practice Direction (Contempt: Reporting Restrictions)WLR ((1982) 1 WLR 1475). Their Lordships found those submissions to be well founded. There was nothing in the broadcast reports of the case during its currency wh......
-
Mr A For Judicial Review
...went on to draw my attention to the practice in England in this area. [42] In a Practice Direction (Contempt: Reporting Restrictions) [1982] 1 WLR 1475 Lord Lane CJ said that every order made under section 4(2) or section 11 must state inter alia its precise scope and the specific purpose o......
-
Birmingham Post & Mail Ltd v Birmingham City Council
...is that those who exercise their powers under section 11 of the Act of 1981 should give immediate and written reasons for doing so (see [1982] 1 WLR 1475). Open justice demands of them no less. LORD JUSTICE MANN 18 For the reasons given in the judgment of the Court, which has been handed d......
-
R v Newtownabbey Magistrates' Court, ex parte Belfast Telegraph Newspapers Ltd
...in mind the words of Lord Diplock in Leveller (at p453G) and should observe Practice Direction (Contempt: Reporting restrictions)WLR ([1982] 1 WLR 1475) which provided that any order under sections 4 and 11 of the 1981 Act had to be committed to writing and state: (a) its precise scope; (b)......
Request a trial to view additional results