Practice Direction (Court of Appeal (Civil Division))

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date1999
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Practice Direction (Criminal Proceedings: Consolidation)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Piglowski v Piglowski
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 June 1999
    ...of the consolidated Court of Appeal Practice Direction issued in April 1999:Practice Direction (Court of Appeal (Civil Division)) [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1027, 1036. I would only add that even if a case does raise an important point of practice or principle, the Court of Appeal should consider car......
  • Apex Fund Services Ltd v Mr. Mathew Clingerman
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court
    • 18 February 2020
    ...Direction: “The relevant test for granting leave to appeal are set out in the Practice Direction (Court of Appeal Civil Division) [1999] 1 WLR 1027. The general test, and the test on points of law, are as follows: “2.8.1 . .The general rule applied by the Court of Appeal, and thus the rele......
  • Tanfern Ltd v Cameron-Macdonald and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 May 2000
    ...cases where a would-be appellant had already lost twice in the courts below (see Practice Direction (Court of Appeal) (Civil Division) [1999] 1 WLR 1027, para 2.19.1). The new statutory provision is even tougher —the relevant point of principle or practice must be an important one —and it ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT