Practice Direction (Crime: Costs)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1989 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Holden & Company v Crown Prosecution Service
...So far as criminal cases are concerned, it is necessary to consider the impact of paragraph 8.1 of the Practice Direction reported at (1989) 1 W.L.R. 625, at page 629: "In addition to the power under regulation 3 of the Costs in Criminal Cases (General) Regulations 1986 to order that costs......
-
Gupta v Comer
...jurisdiction in the context of the Costs in Criminal Cases (General) Regulations 1986 and the Practice Direction of 26th May 1989 (1989) 1 W.L.R. 625, 629. This court held that the Myers v. Elman (supra) criteria applied. 11 If matters had stopped there, there would have been two decisions......
-
Ravenscroft v Rederiaktiebologet Transatlantic
...order proper An order refusing an acquitted defendant his costs under paragraph 2.1(a) of Practice Direction (Crime: Costs) ([1989] 1 WLR 625), on the ground that his own conduct had brought suspicion on himself, was a perfectly proper one and could not be interfered with by the High Court ......
-
R v Gareth Guinness
...defendant's means, the defendant is able to pay and which it is reasonable to order him to pay (see Practice Direction (Crime: Costs) [1989] 1 WLR 625 and R v Northallerton Magistrates Court ex parte Dove [2000] 1 Cr App R (S) 136). 5 The evidence before the Crown Court as to the appellant......
Request a trial to view additional results