Practice Note (Criminal Evidence: Unused Material)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1982 |
| Date | 1982 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
49 cases
-
Kulwant v Public Prosecutor
...no lacuna in the CPC making it necessary to resort to English law. For his purposes, Mr Murugason relied upon the `Guidelines` [1982] 1 All ER 734; 74 Cr App R 302 of the Attorney General of England for the disclosure of `unused material` to the defence. These guidelines are reproduced in A......
-
Breslin and Others v McKenna and Others
...v. Keane [1994] 1 W.L.R. 746. Under the earlier Attorney General's guidelines (Practice Note (Criminal Evidence: Unused Material) [1982] 1 All E.R. 734), the documents disclosed would almost invariably have fallen within the immunity principle as extended in Watson v. M'Ewan [1905] A.C. 480......
-
Minister for Justice v Stapleton
...following the issuing in that year of theAttorney General's Guidelines on disclosure of information to the defence, see Practice Note [1982] 1 All E.R. 734. He refers to the case of Reg. v. Ward (C.A.) [1993] 1 W.L.R. 619, and other cases which developed the obligation further and to variou......
-
Mahon v Rahn
...[1965] 1 QB 348, CA. The Attorney-General's Guidelines (Disclosure of Information to the Defence in cases to be tried on Indictment) 74 Cr App R 302 were then issued in December 1981. However those Guidelines have now been largely superseded by subsequent caselaw—see for example R v Ward 96......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
Disclosure of Foreign Intelligence Material: CPIA, Norwich Pharmacal and the War on Terror
...by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and in conjunction with the revisedAttorney-General’s Guidelines and Code for Crown Prosecutors.8 (1982) 74 Cr App R 302.9 MG6C.10 MG6D.11 Subjectto the test of relevance imposed by CPIA.12 CPIA,s. 21(2).13 RvH and C [2004] UKHL 3, [2004] 2 AC 134.14 CPIA,s.......
-
The Disclosure Sanctions Review: Another Missed Opportunity?
...officers in terms of ‘doing the defence’s job for them’. 9 Attorney-General’s Guidelines on the Disclosure of Unused Evidence 1981 (1982) 74 Cr App R 302. TheGuidelines themselves were an attempt to resolve early uncertainty as to the precise nature ofany duty on the prosecution to disclose......
-
What Next for Public Interest Immunity?
...(Blackstone Press: London, 1997); J. A. Epp,Building on the Decade of Disclosure in Criminal Procedure (Cavendish: London, 2001).6 (1982) 74 Cr App R 302.7 A far from exhaustive list includes R vRichardson, Conlon, Armstrong and Hill, TheTimes (20 October 1989), CA; R vMcIlkenny and Others ......
-
The adversarial defence lawyer: Myths, disclosure and efficiency—A contemporary analysis of the role in the era of the Criminal Procedure Rules
...11(1).10. Above n. 6, at 7.11. Guidelines for the Disclosure of ‘Unused Material’ to the Defence in Cases to be Tried on Indictment (1982) 74 Cr App R 302,para. 1. Although the guidelines are non-statutory, to all intents and purposes they are intended to have the force of a statutoryprovis......
Request a trial to view additional results