Praed v Graham

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1889
Year1889
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
95 cases
  • Dr Clarence Edwin v Harta Kumpulan Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2011
  • Cheng Hang Guan v Perumahan Farlim (Penang) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1993
  • Meek v Fleming
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 26 June 1961
    ...for us to decide, 17 Where the Judge and jury have been misled, another principle makes itself felt. Lord Eshcr (Master of the Rolls) in Praed v. Graham (volume 24 Queen's Bench Division at page 55) said; "If the court can see thst the jury in assessing damages have been guilty of misconduc......
  • Mechanical and General Inventions Company and Lehwess v Austin and Austin Motor Company
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 March 1935
    ...is ordered if at all, because of some error in law. But where there is no error in law the principles are well stated by Lord Esher in Praed v. Graham 24 Q.D.B. 53 at p. 55, where he said "the rule of conduct for the Appellate Court when considering whether a verdict should be set aside on ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT