Prater Ltd v John Sisk & Sons (Holdings) Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Neutral Citation | [2021] EWHC 1113 (TCC) |
Year | 2021 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
2 firm's commentaries
-
Adjudication Enforcement: Arbitration Provisions
...for Greater Manchester v Kier Construction Limited [2021] EWHC 804 (TCC) and Prater Limited v John Sisk & Son (Holdings) Limited [2021] EWHC 1113 (TCC)) had decided that an NOD had to be clear and unambiguous in its wording but did not necessarily need to go into detail or set out specific ......
-
Notify Now Or Forever Hold Your Peace - Notices Of Dissatisfaction Under FIDIC And NEC
...is room for doubt, consider sending the NOD to more than one address. Footnotes 1. [2022] EWHC 1443 (TCC) 2. [2021] EWHC 804 (TCC) 3. [2021] EWHC 1113 (TCC) 4. This was not the case with the 1999 Red and Yellow Books, although it did apply to the Employer's determination under subclause 3.5......