Price v Humphries

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1958
Date1958

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
  • R v Bull
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 10 November 1995
    ...the power of arrest before consent is given. The conventional meaning of "instituted" is "begun by summons" or "charged" (see Price v Humphries [1958] 2 QB 353) and does not need to be enlarged in the 1974 Act, which contains no power of arrest. The purported consent of the Director of Publ......
  • Anderton v Frost
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Bates v Brady
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 12 May 2003
    ...1966 FOOT & MOUTH DISEASE ORDER 1956 SI 324/1956 AG, PEOPLE V GRIFFIN 1974 IR 416 STONE JUSTICES MANUAL 103ED 1971 362 PRICE V HUMPHRIES 1958 2 QB 353 ROYAL V PRESCOTT CLARKE 1966 1 WLR 788 DCR 1997 O.12 r17 MAGEE V O'DEA 1994 1 IR 500 Synopsis: CRIMINAL LAW Judicial review Certiorari -......
  • Rockall v Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 3 July 2008
    ...behalf of the respondent, raised no objection. 9 Mr Lamming's submission is based fairly and squarely on a decision of this court in Price –v- Humphries [1958] 3 WLR 304. The question in that case was whether or not the prosecution had proved that the relevant proceedings had been "institut......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 32-1, January 1959
    • 1 January 1959
    ...authority or consent of some particu-lar officer such as the Director of Public Prosecutions or some otherperson. Price v. Humphries (1958, 3W.L.R.304) raised a questionof how and to what extent the prosecution is required to prove theexistence of such authority and consent as part of its c......