Prinsep v Prinsep
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1929 |
| Date | 1929 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
32 cases
- Best v Best
- Egerton v Egerton
-
Gunner v Gunner and Stirling
... ... Worsley and Wignall F16 ; Dormer (otherwise Ward) v. Ward F17 ; Bosworthwick v. Bosworthwick F18 ; Stedall v. Stedall F19 ; Prinsep v. Prinsep F20 ; Melvill v. Melvill and Woodward F21 ; Smith v. Smith F22 ; Gulbenkian v. Gulbenkian F23 ... It is upon those cases that Mr ... ...
-
F.J.W.T.-M. v C.N.R.T.-M.
...P. & M. 13; 23 L.T. 877. N.(C.) v. N.(R.) [1995] 1 Fam L.J. 14. O'H. v. O'H. [1990] 2 1.R. 558; [1991] I.L.R.M. 108. Prinsep v. Prinsep [1929] P. 225. T v. T (Joinder of Third Parties) [1996] 2 F.L.R. 640. Thomas v. Thomas [1995] 2 F.L.R. 668. Young v. Young (No. 1) [1962] P. 27; [1961] 3 W......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Powers of the Court to Make Orders
...classic statements of what is meant by a nuptial settlement for this purpose is to be found in the judgment of Hill J in Prinsep v Prinsep [1929] P 225 at 232: ‘Is it upon the husband in the character of husband or in the wife in the character of wife, or upon both in the character of husba......
-
Table of Cases
...2 All ER 961, 113 SJ 208 187, 254 Preston v Preston [1982] Fam 17, [1981] 3 WLR 619, [1981] 1 All ER 41, CA 190, 243 Prinsep v Prinsep [1929] P 225, 98 JJP 105, 141 LT 220, PDA 248–9 Proles v Kohli [2018] EWHC 767 (Ch), [2018] 4 WLUK 224 30–1 Pugh, Re; Pugh v Pugh [1943] Ch 387, [1943] 2 Al......