Prinsep v Prinsep

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1929
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Egerton v Egerton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • F.J.W.T.-M. v C.N.R.T.-M.
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 22 June 2004
    ...P. & M. 13; 23 L.T. 877. N.(C.) v. N.(R.) [1995] 1 Fam L.J. 14. O'H. v. O'H. [1990] 2 1.R. 558; [1991] I.L.R.M. 108. Prinsep v. Prinsep [1929] P. 225. T v. T (Joinder of Third Parties) [1996] 2 F.L.R. 640. Thomas v. Thomas [1995] 2 F.L.R. 668. Young v. Young (No. 1) [1962] P. 27; [1961] 3 W......
  • Brooks v Brooks
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 May 1994
    ...I have had the opportunity to consider the decisions of Hill J. in Hargreaves v. Hargreaves [1926] P. 42 and in Prinsep v. Prinsep [1929] P. 225. 105 In Hargreaves the indenture of settlement was executed between the respondent, his mother and certain trustees on the occasion of his reachin......
  • Li Quan (Petitioner) v William Stuart Bray and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 27 October 2014
    ...classic statements of what is meant by a nuptial settlement for this purpose is to be found in the judgment of Hill J in Prinsep v Prinsep [1929] P 225 at 232: 'Is it upon the husband in the character of husband or in the wife in the character of wife, or upon both in the character of husba......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT