Prinsep v Prinsep

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1929
Date1929
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Egerton v Egerton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • F.J.W.T.-M. v C.N.R.T.-M.
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 22 June 2004
    ...P. & M. 13; 23 L.T. 877. N.(C.) v. N.(R.) [1995] 1 Fam L.J. 14. O'H. v. O'H. [1990] 2 1.R. 558; [1991] I.L.R.M. 108. Prinsep v. Prinsep [1929] P. 225. T v. T (Joinder of Third Parties) [1996] 2 F.L.R. 640. Thomas v. Thomas [1995] 2 F.L.R. 668. Young v. Young (No. 1) [1962] P. 27; [1961] 3 W......
  • Brooks v Brooks
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 May 1994
    ...I have had the opportunity to consider the decisions of Hill J. in Hargreaves v. Hargreaves [1926] P. 42 and in Prinsep v. Prinsep [1929] P. 225. 105 In Hargreaves the indenture of settlement was executed between the respondent, his mother and certain trustees on the occasion of his reachin......
  • Li Quan (Petitioner) v William Stuart Bray and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 27 October 2014
    ...classic statements of what is meant by a nuptial settlement for this purpose is to be found in the judgment of Hill J in Prinsep v Prinsep [1929] P 225 at 232: 'Is it upon the husband in the character of husband or in the wife in the character of wife, or upon both in the character of husba......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Inheritance Act Claims 4th ed
    • 14 August 2023
    ...2 All ER 961, 113 SJ 208 187, 254 Preston v Preston [1982] Fam 17, [1981] 3 WLR 619, [1981] 1 All ER 41, CA 190, 243 Prinsep v Prinsep [1929] P 225, 98 JJP 105, 141 LT 220, PDA 248–9 Proles v Kohli [2018] EWHC 767 (Ch), [2018] 4 WLUK 224 30–1 Pugh, Re; Pugh v Pugh [1943] Ch 387, [1943] 2 Al......
  • Powers of the Court to Make Orders
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Inheritance Act Claims 4th ed
    • 14 August 2023
    ...classic statements of what is meant by a nuptial settlement for this purpose is to be found in the judgment of Hill J in Prinsep v Prinsep [1929] P 225 at 232: ‘Is it upon the husband in the character of husband or in the wife in the character of wife, or upon both in the character of husba......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT