Pro-Life Alliance v BBC
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
R (on the application of the British Broadcasting Corporation and another) v Secretary of State for Justice
......In R (ProLife Alliance) v British Broadcasting Corporation [2004] 1 AC 185 , at para. 20, Lord Hoffman explained that the power of the medium is the reason why ......
-
Ministry of Health v Peter Atkinson (on Behalf of The Estate of Susan Atkinson)
....... 157 At [54]. . 158 R v Hansen above n 41 at [108] per Tipping J. . 159 R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC [2003] UKHL 23 , [2004] 1 AC 185 at [75]. . 160 Hill v IHC NZ Inc (2001) 6 HRNZ 449 (CRT). . ......
-
R (A and Another) v Secretary of State for Health
...the unborn child or any existing children in the family. As Laws LJ explained in ProLife Alliance v British Broadcasting Association [2002] 3 WLR 1080; [2002] EWCA Civ 297 at para 6: "The great majority [of abortions] are performed on the third of the five permitted grounds under the Abor......
-
R (Sinclair Collis Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health
...49 However it is important to have in mind that proportionality is not a principle where "one size fits all" (per Lord Walker in R (Pro Life Alliance) v BBC [2004] 1 AC 185, paragraph 144, where the context was freedom of expression and ECHR Article 10(2)): compare Lord Steyn in R (Daly) v ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Transforming Breach of Confidence? Towards a Common Law Right of Privacy under the Human Rights Act
...Bladet Tromso vNorway (1999) 29 EHRR125; News Verlags GmbH & CoKG vAustria (2000) no 31457/96.210 See recently, Pro-Life Alliance vBBC [2002] 3 WLR 1080.211 Bladet Tromso, n 209 above, para 59; also n 206 above.212 n 26 above.213 n 26 above.214 Tugendhat and Christie, n 8 above, 420– 421.To......
-
‘If Thy Right Eye Offend Thee, Pluck it Out’: R v BBC, ex p ProLife Alliance
...[2003] UKHL 23. [2003] 2 All ER 977.2R (on the application of Prolife Alliance) vBritish Broadcasting Corporation [2002] EWCA Civ297; [2002] 2 All ER 756 (CA).3 A. Geddis, ‘What Future For Political Advertising On The United Kingdom’s TelevisionScreens?’ [2002] PL 615. See also J. Rowbottom......