Pro-Life Alliance v BBC

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judgment Date2002
Date2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • R (on the application of the British Broadcasting Corporation and another) v Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 January 2012
    ......In R (ProLife Alliance) v British Broadcasting Corporation [2004] 1 AC 185 , at para. 20, Lord Hoffman explained that the power of the medium is the reason why ......
  • Ministry of Health v Peter Atkinson (on Behalf of The Estate of Susan Atkinson)
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 14 May 2012
    ....... 157 At [54]. . 158 R v Hansen above n 41 at [108] per Tipping J. . 159 R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC [2003] UKHL 23 , [2004] 1 AC 185 at [75]. . 160 Hill v IHC NZ Inc (2001) 6 HRNZ 449 (CRT). . ......
  • R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 16 October 2009
    ...... Fraud O–ce (JUSTICE intervening) [ 2008 ] UKHL 60 ;[ 2009 ] 1 AC 756 ;[ 2008 ] 3 WLR 568 ;[ 2008 ] 4 All ER 927 , HL(E) R (ProLife Alliance) v British Broadcasting Corpn [ 2003 ] UKHL 23 ;[ 2004 ] 1 AC 185 ;[ 2003 ] 2 WLR 1403 ;[ 2003 ] 2 All ER 977 , HL(E) S (A Child) ......
  • Pro-Life Alliance v BBC
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 15 May 2003
    ...judicial review challenge. The court treated the hearing in the Court of Appeal as the substantive hearing, and allowed the appeal: see [2002] 3 WLR 1080. The court made a declaration that the BBC's refusal to broadcast ProLife Alliance's party election broadcast was 6 Freedom of political......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Transforming Breach of Confidence? Towards a Common Law Right of Privacy under the Human Rights Act
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 66-5, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...Bladet Tromso vNorway (1999) 29 EHRR125; News Verlags GmbH & CoKG vAustria (2000) no 31457/96.210 See recently, Pro-Life Alliance vBBC [2002] 3 WLR 1080.211 Bladet Tromso, n 209 above, para 59; also n 206 above.212 n 26 above.213 n 26 above.214 Tugendhat and Christie, n 8 above, 420– 421.To......
  • ‘If Thy Right Eye Offend Thee, Pluck it Out’: R v BBC, ex p ProLife Alliance
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 66-6, November 2003
    • 1 November 2003
    ...[2003] UKHL 23. [2003] 2 All ER 977.2R (on the application of Prolife Alliance) vBritish Broadcasting Corporation [2002] EWCA Civ297; [2002] 2 All ER 756 (CA).3 A. Geddis, ‘What Future For Political Advertising On The United Kingdom’s TelevisionScreens?’ [2002] PL 615. See also J. Rowbottom......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT