Pryor v City Offices Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1882 |
| Year | 1882 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Minister for Justice v Information Commissioner
...is as follows. In the singular - proceeding - the word means an action as opposed to any step in an action: Pryor -v- City OfficesCompany 10 QBD 504. However, there are a number of decided cases where proceeding in the singular was held to mean a step in an action: Smalley -v- Robey & Comp......
-
Whitter v Peters; Peart v Stewart
...under this section was again applied by the Court of Appeal as recently as 1972 in Jennison v. Baker (1972) 2 QBD 52. In Pryor v. City Offices Company (1883) 10 QBD 504 Lord Justice Bowen expressed the view at p.509 that the object of the power was to clothe the inferior courts with the sam......
-
Attorney General v Simpson (No. 2)
...Justice Lavery. (1) Before Maguire C.J., Lavery, Kingsmill Moore, O'Daly andMaguire JJ. (2) Ante at page 105. (3) [1931] I. R. 430. (4) 10 Q. B. D. 504. (1) [1947] I. R. (2) 82 I. L. T. R. 79. (3) [1913] 2 I. R. 342. (4) [1942] I. R. 610. (5) [1906] 2 K. B. 105. (6) [1912] 1 K. B. 365. (1) ......
-
Levett v Levett & Smith
...word 'proceedings' may very according to its contest, and in one authority to which our attention was drawn, ( Pryor v. City Offices Co. 10 Q.B.D. 504), from the decision of this Court it was quite clear that the word 'proceedings" may cover the whole of the proceedings in question, beginni......
Request a trial to view additional results