Pugh v Golden Valley Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1878
Year1878
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • British Transport Commission v Westmorland County Council. ; British Transport Commission v Worcestershire County Council
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 May 1957
    ...repairing and using the railway. See Reg. v. Wycombe Railway Company Law Rep. 2 Q.B. 310, approved in Pugh v. Golden Valley Railway Co. 15 Ch. D. 330Emsley v. North Eastern Railway Company [1896] 1 Ch. 418. 36 I add that I am by no means satisfied that it would be impossible to discontinue ......
  • Davson & Company Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • Guyana
    • Supreme Court (British Guiana)
    • Invalid date
  • Commissioner of Valuation v Sligo Harbour Commissioners
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 30 June 1898
    ...11 H. L. Cas. 443. Mills v. JenningsELR 13 Ch. D. 648. Mr. Justice Gibson's judgmentIR [1897] 2 I. R. 528. Pugh v. Golden Bridge Co.ELR 15 Ch. D. 330. Smith's CaseELR 11 Ch. D. 579. The Limerick CaseUNKIR I. R. 6 C. L. 432. Tyne Commissioners v. ChirtonENR 1 E. & E. 516. 214 THE IRISH REPOR......
  • Bahamas Telecommunications Corporation et Al
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 2 May 1994
    ... ... S. Johnson & Company Ltd. on 10th August, 1993 and filed on 13th August, 1993, ... 8 of 1976) and see also the line of railway cases to some of which I shall shortly refer ... 2 Q.B. 310 which decision was followed in Pugh v. Golden Valley Railway Company (1880) 15 Ch. D. 330 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free