Pusey v Pusey
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1684 |
| Date | 01 January 1684 |
English Reports Citation: 23 E.R. 465
IN COURT, LORD KEEPER.
Pusey
and
Pusey
See Dowling V. Betjemann, 1862, 2 J. & H. 552.
Case 270.-pusey versus pusey. [See Dowling v. Betjemann, 1862, 2 J. & H. 552.] Eodem die. In Court, Lord Keeper. Land held by the tenure of a horn. Bill brought by the heir for the horn. Bill was, that a horn, which time out of mind had gone along with the plaintiff's estate, and was delivered to his ancestors in ancient time to hold their land by, might be delivered to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
Duke of Somerset v Cookson
... ... So, a bill might lie for an heir-loom ; as in the case of Pusey v. Pusey, 1 Vern. 273. And though in trover the plaintiff could have only damages, yet in detinue the thing itself, if it can be found, is to be ... ...
-
Plampin v Betts
...£57, 15s.; £150, 15s.; and £90; and 24 guineas, and also the sum of £500. E. L. English Reports Citation: 23 E.R. 466 IN COURT, LORD KEEPER23 E.R. 465 LORD Case 269.-plampin versus betts. 20 Novembris [1684]. Lord Keeper. A decree whereby the defendant was to be concluded by the plaintiff's......
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v. Prewal, 2004 ONCJ 195 ...................................................................... 99 Pusey v. Pusey (1684), 1 Vern. 273, 23 E.R. 465 (Ch.) .............................. 384, 391 Putt v. Kunetsky, 2010 BCSC 394 ........................................................................
-
Specific Performance and Injunctions
...inadequacy of damages threshold, and the seller was directed 40 (1859), 29 LJ Ch 28 [ Falcke ]. See also Pusey v Pusey (1684), 1 Vern 273, 23 ER 465 (Ch) (ancient horn with alleged connection to King Canute); Duke of Somerset v Cookson (1735), 3 P Wms 390 (Ch) (antique silver altar piece in......
-
Table of cases
...Purewal v Prewal, 2004 ONCJ 195 .................................................................... 153 Pusey v Pusey (1684), 1 Vern 273, 23 ER 465 (Ch) ................................... 534, 542 Putt v Kunetsky, 2010 BCSC 394 ...................................................................
-
Specific Performance: Chattels, Shares, and Payment of Money
...Fells ] (silver altarpiece); Falcke v Gray (1859), 4 Dr 651, 62 ER 250 (VC) [ Falcke ] (old jars). 3 See Pusey v Pusey (1684), 1 Vern 273, 23 ER 465 (Ch) [ Pusey ]. 534 Speciic Performance: Chattels, Shares, and Payment of Money 535 therefore, damages were an inadequate remedy. In 1856, the......
Get Started for Free