Pwllbach Colliery Company v Woodman

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1915
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
81 cases
  • Richard Eaton Pearson v Lillie Eileen Julia Foster
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 27 Enero 2017
    ...has such a right as a matter of implication. Mr Jones cited in support of this submission the decision of the House of Lords in Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman [1915] AC 634. Lord Parker of Waddington there said (at 646): "The law will readily imply the grant or reservation of such easem......
  • Bephia v Sahijaram A Thani
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • Coventry v Lawrence
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 23 Julio 2014
    ...to make a noise which would otherwise be a nuisance can be an easement or not. As Lord Sumner said in Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman [1915] AC 634, 649, a right in favour of a property owner over neighbouring land (in that case, to spread coal dust emanating from the property owner's la......
  • Lawrence (Katherine) and Another v Fen Tigers Ltd & others (No 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 Febrero 2014
    ...matters whether the right to make a noise which would otherwise be a nuisance can be an easement or not. As Lord Sumner said in Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman [1915] AC 634, 649, a right in favour of a property owner over neighbouring land (in that case, to spread coal dust emanating f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Creation of Easements and Profits
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part I. Easements and profits à prendre
    • 30 Agosto 2016
    ...per Nourse LJ; Maud v Thornton [1929] IR 454 at 458, per Meredith J. 8 Megarry & Wade at 28-015. 9 Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman [1915] AC 634 at 646–647; Wong v Beaumont Property Trust [1965] 1 QB 173; Donovan v Rana [2014] EWCA Civ 99, where a drainage easement was found to be necess......
  • Sources of Authority: Common Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • 23 Junio 2017
    ...municipality was the plaintiff. For comment on the decision, see Haigh & Nadler, above note 101. 103 Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman , [1915] AC 634 (HL). 104 Manchester Corp v Farnworth , [1930] AC 171 (HL). 105 Grosvenor Hotel Co v Hamilton , [1894] 2 QB 836. Sources of Authority: Comm......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT