Pyrene Company Ltd v Scindia Navigation Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date14 April 1954
Date14 April 1954
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
131 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Package Or Unit Limitation Under The Hague-Visby Rules
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 25 April 2017
    ...that a bill of lading would be issued and the Claimant was entitled to demand the issue of a bill of lading (see Pyrene v Scindia [1954] 2 QB 402 as approved by the Court of Appeal in The 'Happy Ranger' [2002] 2 Lloyd's rep 357, both cases in which cargo was damaged during the loading opera......
  • English and Australian courts diverge on Hague-Visby package limitation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 7 June 2018
    ...could have been required by the shipper. Reliance in support was placed on the decision in Pyrene Co Ltd v Scindia Navigation Co Ltd [1954] 2 QB 402. The Court then examined the limitation issue and closely analysed the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in El The ......
  • Transport & Logistics News - March 2017: part 4
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 April 2017
    ...the containers were part of the loading operation. The Court of Appeal quoted the well-known passage of Devlin J in Pyrene v Scindia (1954) 2 QB 402 in which the "tackle to tackle" rule had been modestly extended to catch cases in which the goods were lifted from the quay side by the vessel......
13 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACTUAL ILLEGALITY AND CONFLICT OF LAWS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 December 1995
    ...shall apply. There is no need for the issuance of a physical bill of lading, see Pyrene Co. Ltd. v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd.[1954] 2 Q.B. 402. For a recent case where the court held that the document issued (a consignment note having all three attributes of a bill of lading) was a ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Dissenting Judgments in the Law Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2018
    ...for Lands for New South Wales [1954] 1 WLR 1410, [1954] 3 All ER 514, 98 SJ 802, PC 149 Pyrene Co Ltd v Scindia Navigation Co Ltd [1954] 2 QB 402, [1954] 2 WLR 1005, [1954] 2 All ER 158 91 Queen, The v Coney (1882) LR 8 QBD 534, 51 LJMC 66, 46 LT 307, 46 JP 404, 30 WR 678, 15 Cox CC 46, CCR......
  • The Federal Courts and Admiralty Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. 50 Years of History
    • 4 October 2021
    ...a Hague Rules 1924 clause, but a diferent and lower limitation of liability and was upheld. 122 Pyrene Co v Scindia Navigation Ltd , [1954] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 321 (QB), followed by Anticosti Shipping Co Ltd v St Amand , [1959] SCR 372, followed by Saint Lawrence Construction CA, above note 52. 1......
  • Upholding Contractual Intentions Lord Denning's Dissent in Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Dissenting Judgments in the Law Part II - Company and Commercial Law
    • 29 August 2018
    ...exclusion clause. 47 44 An illustration of these principles lay in The Kite [1933] P 154 and Pyrene Co Ltd v Scindia Navigation Co Ltd [1954] 2 QB 402, although not strictly a bailment case, it was covered by the same principles. 45 Lord Denning’s reasoning was that the owners had requested......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT