Quarrier v Colston

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1842
Date01 January 1842
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 41 E.R. 587

HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY

Quarrier
and
Colston

S. C. 12 L. J. Ch. 57; 6 Jur. 959. See Kaufman v. Gerson [1903], 2 K. B. 119.

[147] quarrler ). colston. May 9, June 21, Nov. 8, 1842. .'./:. .... _ [S. C. 12 L. J. Ch. 57 ; 6 Jur. 959. See Kaufman v. Gerwn [19031, -2 K. B.'119.1 L L J ortf7J r .aJi.a Gambling debts contracted in this country, as well as the securities given for them, " are void and cannot be recovered. But money won at play, or lent for the purpose of gambling, in a country where the games in question are not illegal, may be recovered in the Courts of this country. And, therefore, where an unascertained portion of a balance of account, for which an I. 0. U. had been given, was admitted to consist of money lent for the purpose of playing at public tables in Germany, but it did not appear that the games played at such tables were forbidden by the laws of that country; the Court, on appeal, dissolved an injunction which had been granted to restrain an action brought to recover the whole balance. The bill in this cause, which was filed by the Plaintiff as personal representative of (1. W. Tobin deceased, prayed that the memorandum of debt which had been given by the deceased, shortly before his death, to the Defendant, might be delivered up to be cancelled; and that the Defendant might be restrained from proceeding with .an action which he had commenced against the Plaintiff, for the recovery of the sum mentioned in that memorandum. The memorandum was in these words :- "I, George Webb Tobin, owe J. M. Colston, Esq., 525 money received. G. W. Tobin." The bill alleged that the memorandum was given by Tobin when in a state of intoxication, and that it was wholly or in great part made up of sums which the Defendant had either won from Tobin at cards, or which he had lent to him for the purpose of gaming, while they were upon a tour together on the Continent. And 4ifter setting forth a correspondence which had taken place between the Plaintiff and the Defendant since the death of Tobin, in which the Defendant had admitted that a considerable part of the demand was of that nature, the bill charged, amongst other things, that the Defendant had always refused to state the particulars of the amount for which the memorandum was given, and that he ought to set forth when and where, and in whose presence, and on what account, &c., the [148] consideration for the said memorandum and every part thereof was paid ; and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Las Vegas Hilton Corporation trading as Las Vegas Hilton v Khoo Teng Hock Sunny
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 Agosto 1996
    ... ... [Emphasis added.] One of the earliest cases on point is Quarrier v Colston (1842) 1 Ph 146 where the Lord Chancellor, on an appeal, held that money lent for the purpose of gambling in Germany where the games in ... ...
  • C.H.T. Ltd v Ward
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 7 Noviembre 1963
    ...the consideration should "become bad." 33 That case was decided on 9th December, 142. But on 4th November of the same year, in Quarrier v. Colston (1842), 1 Phillips page 147, a case not cited in Applegarth v. Colley, Lord Lyndhuu'st, Lord Chancellor, sitting on appeal from the Vice-Chancel......
  • Star City Pty Ltd (fka Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) v Tan Hong Woon
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 25 Febrero 2002
    ...Ltd v International Transport Workers' Federation [1982] 3 All ER 841 (refd) Poyser v Minors (1881) 7 QBD 329 (refd) Quarrier v Colston (1842) 1 Ph 147; 41 ER 587 (refd) Quek Chiau Beng v Phua Swee Pah Jimmy [2000] 3 SLR (R) 761; [2001] 1 SLR 762 (refd) Saxby v Fulton [1909] 2 KB 208 (refd)......
  • Crockfords Club Ltd v Prakash Mehta and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 Octubre 1991
    ...of cash or tokens for a cheque there is an underlying loan. See Robinson v. Bland (1760) 2 Burr. 1070, 97 ER 717, Quarrier v. Colston (1842) 1 Ph. 147, Sociéeté Anonyme v. Baumgart (1927) 96 L.J. K.B. 789, and Carlton Hall Club Ltd. v. Laurence (1929) 98 L.J. K.B. 305, and the review of the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT