Quartz Hill Gold Mining Company v Eyre

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date1883
Year1883
Date1883

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
78 cases
  • Crawford et Al v Financial Institutions Services Ltd (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 19 June 2003
    ... ... bank to Regardless Limited, and as that company is wholly owned by the first petitioner and his ... ...
  • Wai Wing Properties Pte Ltd v Lim, Ganesh and Liu (sued as a firm)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 31 March 1994
    ... ... dispute between the plaintiffs and a company in which the learned judge had an interest. The ... media.Two authorities are relied upon: Quartz Hill Consolidated Gold Mining Co v Eyre and ... ...
  • Peter Willers v Albert Gubay
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 15 May 2015
    ...that, if Gregory is not binding, then the court should apply and follow the Privy Council's interpretation of The Quartz Hill Consolidated Gold Mining Company v Eyre (1883) 11 QBD 674, CA (see, in particular, per Lord Wilson JSC at paras 57 to 61, pp 390G–392G). In Crawford Adjusters the ma......
  • AB Nicholas; Ing Chiat
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1934
  • Get Started for Free