Quietlynn Ltd v Plymouth City Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1987 |
| Date | 1987 |
| Year | 1987 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
46 cases
- Re Churchill
-
Danville Walker v Contractor-General
...as an ultra vires act on the part of the Contractor-General. Lord Irvine at page 161 of the judgment of Boddington, noted that in Wicks and Quietlynn, where there were challenges to administrative acts, the impugned acts were directed specifically at the defendants and there were provisions......
-
Auburn Court Ltd v Kingston and Saint Andrew Corporation
...taken place) was invalid but not a complete nullity." 23 Again Lord Hoffman on page 893 approved of the following passage in Quietlynn Ltd. v Plymouth City Council [1988] Q.B. 114 where Webster J. said: "The law relating to judicial review has become increasingly more sophisticated in the ......
-
Boddington v. British Transport Police,
...[1969] 2 A.C. 147 (H.L.))." [39] The particular statutory schemes in question in R. v. Wicks , [1998] A.C. 92 and in the Quietlynn case [1988] 1 Q.B. 114, did justify a construction which limited the rights of the defendant to call the legality of an administrative act into question. But in......
Get Started for Free