Quilter v Mapleson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1875

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
33 cases
  • Detik Ria Sdn Bhd and Another v Prudential Corporation Holding Ltd and Another
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2022
  • Billson and Others v Residential Apartments Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 12 December 1991
    ...entry upon the property. 46It was, of course, the ratio of the decision of the Court of Appeal in the Pakwood TransportQuilter v. Mapleson (1882) 9 Q.B.D. 672 a landlord forfeited a lease before the Act of 1881 came into force by issuing and serving a writ for possession. He recovered judgm......
  • Billson and Others v Residential Apartments Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 February 1991
    ...thereafter be said that the lessor "is" proceeding to enforce his rights: he has proceeded: Rogers v. Rice (1892) 2 Ch. 170; Quilter v. Mapleson (1882) 9 Q.B.D. 672. 43Mr Driscoll, for the defendants, contends that those cases do not cover a case such as the present where the landlord has n......
  • Crampton v R
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 23 November 2000
    ...at 724 [ 11 ER 1200 at 1209]. 144CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 at 202 [111]. 145 See eg Judicature Act 1873 (UK), s 4; Quilter v Mapleson (1882) 9 QBD 672 at 676; Banbury v Bank of Montreal [1918] AC 626 at 146R v Snow (1915) 20 CLR 315 at 322; Werribee Council v Kerr (1928) 42 CLR 1 at 20–2......
  • Get Started for Free