Quinn v Mackinnon

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1963
Year1963
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, ex parte Blackburn
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 January 1968
    ...They used to promote roulette without a zero and demand sixpence for themselves on every stake. That device wasdeclared unlawful in Quinn v. Mackinnon, 1963, 1 Queen's Bench, p. 874. Next, they claimed that they could take sixpence from every player on every spin of the wheel. That device ......
  • Kursaal Casino Ltd v Crickitt (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords (England)
    • Invalid date
  • Allan (J. M.) (Merchandising) Ltd v Cloke
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 5 March 1963
    ...to the organisation before every spin of the wheel. This is a point which was left open by the Divisional Court in the recent case of Quinn v. Nackinnon, 1963, 2 Weekly Law Reports, p. 391. I am quite clear that the sum of 6d. before every spin of the wheel is not a sum of money determined......
  • Allan (J. M.) (Merchandising) Ltd v Cloke
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 5 March 1963
    ...to the organisation before every spin of the wheel. This is a point which was left open by the Divisional Court in the recent case of Quinn v. Nackinnon, 1963, 2 Weekly Law Reports, p. 391. I am quite clear that the sum of 6d. before every spin of the wheel is not a sum of money determined......
  • Get Started for Free